[NX127]

Originally posted by Desert Rain

So it's 'too' many dates when it leads to her pumelling the other girls grosses? Move along.



No.



P!nk doesn't do stadiums because her gymnastics schtick requires a roof.
Taylor's touring potential is limited to the Anglosphere.
Rihanna hasn't had a platinum album in any South American country (her last two went Gold in Brazil) since Loud. Her touring power in Latin America is pretty much non existent.

You're basically saying "If these girls could tour better, they could gross the same as Beyoncé despite her not doing Africa or Asia or the much demanded 3rd US leg"....

Try again.

100%

may I add P!nk's touring potential is limited to te Pacific Anglosphere too, same as Taylor

[alestevens]

Originally posted by AHemsworth

While Bey isn't on the same level as Madge now, she is clearly on her way. I honestly think if the majority of her career was pop oriented she would be so much bigger now. Given that's she a R&B artist her tours are really impressive.

I actually think that not being pop is what made her so huge. Lets be honest, pop rarely gets any respect. As soon as a new popstar appears, they are considered talentless by default. Bey earned tons of respect for never going too mainstream and staying loyal to her urban roots. See what going full-on mainstream did for Usher´s respect and notable career

[Stitches.]

Because she's art.

[LoveLiveMusic]

Originally posted by AHemsworth

While Bey isn't on the same level as Madge now, she is clearly on her way. I honestly think if the majority of her career was pop oriented she would be so much bigger now. Given that's she a R&B artist her tours are really impressive.

I'm finding the opposite. I like that Beyonce is getting a lot more hip-hop/rap sounding on BEYONCE and this is the first album I find has a lot of replay value on it and I wanted to listen to it outside of the singles. To me she's a lot more appealing with this darker ghetto like image (Yonce). I mean, the Diva performance from the Mrs. Carter Show with the Clique mashup just slayed. Even more so when they did Clique/Diva I was completely dead.

[Simplyvirtue]

the fact that some people believe she put 2 tours together and called it 1 is hilarious and delusional

[alestevens]

Originally posted by NX127

100%

may I add P!nk's touring potential is limited to te Pacific Anglosphere too, same as Taylor

Not even Taylor is limited to the Anglosphere, let alone P!nk. The delusion was real with that one

[Quietly Trek]

Originally posted by LoveLiveMusic

201 shows. It is impressive when you look at the size of the venues she was initially playing for and how she was able to increase her venues and the capacities of the show. She was doing venues that held 3500 (Boston), 2740 (Vancouver) etc, and from the first 35 shows only the 4 New York shows combined barely made over $1 million, so what are you expecting?

But if you want to talk about how a large grossing tour isn't impressive, then I guess it's ok to discredit someone you like, like Cher and her $260 million grossing tour from 325 shows.

She was obviously going to increase the venues as she become more famous progressively throughout the tour. It's still not that impressive compared to Bey's last solo tour.

Cher's touring is scattered and she literally played the same venues to death, so of course attendance dropped after some time. However, The Believe Tour (the one before the tour you're mentioning) was one of the biggest of its time by a female, and her stint in Las Vegas and her current tour definitely prove that she is indeed a touring force.