Celeb Photos: Karlie "Forgets" to Tag Katy - Page 3

JesusORGod

Quote:

Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1

Really? Because according to this link Cosmopolitan and Harper's Bazaar on the top row are more popular than Vanity Fair and Allure on the bottom row?

Yeah sure. Elle, Grazia and Glamour are more popular then Vogue.

aloirt

Regina George

IBeMe

Quote:

Originally posted by KareBear

I hear early onset Alzheimers is a thing. She could've just forgot

this!!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by JesusORGod

Keria and Nicole both don't have IG but they both good cover sells because they're Chanel girls.

Yes.....

and I trust you because you work for Versace. omg

I sincerly thought katy was up there with Rih in terms of magazin selling power..I mean I know Katy herself said she is not into high fashion too much etc but still

NOW

The fact that she could've easily hid Katy's cover away from the rest but just left it there. She's Taylor's bff, she knows what she's doing

RoarRiteNow1

Quote:

Originally posted by JesusORGod

Yeah sure. Elle, Grazia and Glamour are more popular then Vogue.

What's your source for that magazine thing though? Because it might be different for magazines, I don't really know but usually the best-selling products are put at the top where consumers can easily see them. It's kind of basic marketing

JesusORGod

Quote:

Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1

What's your source for that magazine thing though? Because usually the best-selling products are put at the top where consumers can easily see it. It's kind of basic marketing

What world you live in?! I've worked in retail. When something sell well, you don't need to put it on top so consumers can see it because that's promoting it. It'd be selling very well you most likely wont have any in stock. Those that are low sellers get put on the top to make them look popular because they have a lot of it in stock and need to sell it. As you can see that marketing worked with the person who made that post. Kiiii.

ezra

Quote:

Originally posted by JesusORGod

What world you live in?! I've worked in retail. When something sell well, you don't need to put it on top so consumers can see it because that's promoting it. It'd be selling very well you most likely wont have any in stock. Those that are low sellers get put on the top to make them look popular because they have a lot of it in stock and need to sell it. As you can see that marketing worked with the person who made that post. Kiiii.

The effortless clock.

Cyanide

Quote:

Originally posted by JesusORGod

LMFAO

You do know those covers that SELL gets put on the bottom and those that don't get put on the top. As you can see all the big names that are selling well are at the bottom. She KNEW what she was doing with that post.

Not her throwing a DOUBLE-SIDED cloud of shade

taylor__fan

Quote:

Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1

Really? Because according to this link Cosmopolitan and Harper's Bazaar on the top row are more popular than Vanity Fair and Allure on the bottom row?

Seems accurate, Elle is #1 and bottom row

Dollas n Diamonds

Quote:

Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1

What's your source for that magazine thing though? Because it might be different for magazines, I don't really know but usually the best-selling products are put at the top where consumers can easily see them. It's kind of basic marketing

The opposite actually. You put the lowest selling at the top so it catches the eye of the casual buyer subconsciously making them look better and more desirable

IBeMe

Quote:

Originally posted by JesusORGod

What world you live in?! I've worked in retail. When something sell well, you don't need to put it on top so consumers can see it because that's promoting it. It'd be selling very well you most likely wont have any in stock. Those that are low sellers get put on the top to make them look popular because they have a lot of it in stock and need to sell it. As you can see that marketing worked with the person who made that post. Kiiii.

this makes sense. I was going to post that if something isnt selling well the managers at the coffee shop I used to work at would tell me to try and "forcefully" sell it by putting it on display front and center and mentioning it when I greet the customer. so I guess the same rule would apply with magazins, clothes etc..

Qwerty1234

Quote:

Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1

What's your source for that magazine thing though? Because it might be different for magazines, I don't really know but usually the best-selling products are put at the top where consumers can easily see them. It's kind of basic marketing

Well, kinda. It's the reason you'll see MARS and SNICKERS on the top shelves and some cheap generic chocolate candy bar on the bottom shelves. Same goes for any other product. Stores want you to buy the most expensive option.

The products are usually best-selling because they're put at eye level. So in theory, stores could be putting a magazine on top to promote it because it's selling less as well, to boost sales. Or it's on top because they're the most espensive..

Unless, you have store numbers, it's impossible to say.

Penny.

DayFusion

RoarRiteNow1

Quote:

Originally posted by JesusORGod

What world you live in?! I've worked in retail. When something sell well, you don't need to put it on top so consumers can see it because that's promoting it. It'd be selling very well you most likely wont have any in stock. Those that are low sellers get put on the top to make them look popular because they have a lot of it in stock and need to sell it. As you can see that marketing worked with the person who made that post. Kiiii.

But still, how come Harper's Bazaar and Cosmopolitan are on the top row when they are more popular magazines than Vanity Fair and Allure which are on the bottom row?

YR.

Urgh

JesusORGod

Quote:

Originally posted by IBeMe

this makes sense. I was going to post that if something isnt selling well the managers at the coffee shop I used to work at would tell me to try and "forcefully" sell it by putting it on display front and center and mentioning it when I greet the customer. so I guess the same rule would apply with magazins, clothes etc..

Yeah ofc. That's how it works. This not Itunes.

LOL @ people on here not picking up on Karlie's well played out tea tho....

Opacho

Maybe she did just forget? Katy's cover is pretty forgettable.

Quote:

Originally posted by Qwerty1234

Well, kinda. It's the reason you'll see MARS and SNICKERS on the top shelves and some cheap generic chocolate candy bar on the bottom shelves. Same goes for any other product. Stores want you to buy the most expensive option.

The products are usually best-selling because they're put at eye level. So in theory, stores could be putting a magazine on top to promote it because it's selling less as well, to boost sales. Or it's on top because they're the most espensive..

Unless, you have store numbers, it's impossible to say.

Mhm, but candy and magazines are treated differently. Eye-level/top shelves are prime real estate for food items because that's where they're seen the most. Food companies buy those spots so they will sell more. Magazines don't sell as much as food does so the method's a bit different. Things that sell less are put at top to make them sell more so they can get rid of excess inventory. Stores don't make that much money from magazine sales so they want to get rid of them as soon as they can, meaning excess inventory is pushed more to get rid of it faster.

I thought it was common sense that the lower-selling magazines get put at the top?

I guess not.

Quote:

Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1

But still, how come Harper's Bazaar and Cosmopolitan are on the top row when they are more popular magazines than Vanity Fair and Allure which are on the bottom row?

Those PUBLICATIONS as a whole are more popular, that doesn't mean every single issue is going to be more popular than issues from VF and Allure. It's all about who's covering the issue and I guess Katy's just not a good cover girl. It's not that hard to understand.

Lithium9

it's seems like the entire industry is against katy
It makes me wonder if she's truly an awful person

Penny.

i cant @kats trying to say that katy's harpers bazaar is outselling Vogue & Vanity Fair