I was expecting this to be posted by Rainbows or Navin.
Quote:
Originally posted by Gui Blackout
I was already getting the receipts to shade back.
I cannot at you two. I would never shade the Princess of Pop.
A large majority of my city is going to read about the legendary Brit being a "A Dead-Eyed Stripper" onstage.
Its all false & I hope the reviewer rots in the pits of hell.
The Sun is like the tabloids
Why don't reputable newspapers ever give Britney good reviews...
So E!, Billboard, Rolling Stone,The Sacramento Bee, LA Times, OCReloaded, ArtistsDirect, GutterSniperNews, Popsugar, etc etc...are all tabloid and not reputable newspapers and or publications.
SiXo is my husband. I remember the night that gif was even taken from. That was the night he changed his pants behind a chair and I could see his blue underwear and his cute ass. I want to suck his dick right now.
Oh helllll no... You come into a Britney thread and talk all nasty? The Lord is in your presence.
So E!, Billboard, Rolling Stone,The Sacramento Bee, LA Times, OCReloaded, ArtistsDirect, GutterSniperNews, Popsugar, etc etc...are all tabloid and not reputable newspapers and or publications.
Britney always has you so worked up ....
Im talking about the Toronto reviews. Im sorry you weren't able to understand that.
The fact that two writers attending the same show can come away with such diametrically opposed reactions just tells you that every reviewer probably comes with his or her own biases. The show's not perfect, but it's not awful either. Surely, some writers choose to focus on the negative, while others accentuate the positive.
The fact that two writers attending the same show can come away with such diametrically opposed reactions just tells you that every reviewer probably comes with his or her own biases. The show's not perfect, but it's not awful either. Surely, some writers choose to focus on the negative, while others accentuate the positive.
I want to suck his dick right now. 
