[Roman]

Originally posted by Satellites

The critic is probably a.....[insert common sense here]! I am going to see it anyway.

I hope you enjoy it!

This "review" is very one-sided and...well...hateful. I don't really know what else to say, I just hope the public will disagree. She really needs something positive to come her way in her career.

[Da beezness!]

Originally posted by Kunt

Ouch.

Hopefully Xtina and her stans eat the humble pie with a lil more conviction that the first time around.

[Raguabros]

Well nobody expected a masterpiece to be honest, i just hope it is fun and doesnt' bore me that's all, not looking for anything else with this film.

[JC.]

NY Observer

I lived in NY and I had never heard of that irrelevant Newspaper

[RainMan]

Im shocked!

[starstruck]

lmao there are tons more. all the good and top critics are dragging.

[Monster]

Not surprised at all. And yesterday an X stan was convinced this movie was critically acclaimed.

[starstruck]

^^

from the looks of box office predictions, it will flop too. movies need to breakeven with making more than its budget.

[Nicole]

This is what the latest tracking at the box office is looking like:

Tangled: 45m

Burlesque: 20m

Faster: 16m

Love/Drugs: 14m

It won't flop. But the budget is huge so 50-60m total US gross might not be enough.

[Monster]

Originally posted by Haus_of_Nicole

This is what the latest tracking at the box office is looking like:

Tangled: 45m

Burlesque: 20m

Faster: 16m

Love/Drugs: 14m

It won't flop. But the budget is huge so 50-60m total US gross might not be enough.

What's its budget?

[Nicole]

Originally posted by PurpleMonster

What's its budget?

They're saying 55M, which is not true. With reshoots, 80M+.

[starstruck]

What's The Deal: Not good enough or moving enough or musically engaging enough to be memorable and not hilariously horrible enough a piece of failed art to qualify as actual camp, this movie falls right down into the worst sinkhole of all, the middling pit of mediocrity and memory failure.

http://www.movies.com/movie-reviews/...e-white/m62830

[D.M.F]

Originally posted by Haus_of_Nicole

They're saying 55M, which is not true. With reshoots, 80M+.

Girl, you know 80+ mill is a lie. Only Cher reshot her ballad.

The studio, and other sources >>>>>>>>>>

[Raguabros]

80M including promoting it?

I suppose it will gain its budget back with the worldwide box office

[Monster]

Originally posted by D.M.F

Girl, you know 80+ mill is a lie. Only Cher reshot her ballad.

The studio, and other sources >>>>>>>>>>

[D.M.F]

That would make it 1 of the highest productions for a musical in movie history.

X always breaking records.

[Nicole]

Originally posted by D.M.F

Girl, you know 80+ mill is a lie. Only Cher reshot her ballad.

I said the movie was the most expensive in Screengems history, you said I was lying.

A month later, THR confirmed it was the most expensive in Screengems history.

I said it was testing well, a month later THR confirmed it.

I said it was extensively reshot, a month later THR confirmed it.

I've been saying it's tracking well, a month later the LA Times confirmed it.

The movie cost $67M before reshoots. I have a 100% reliable source.

Edit: I've even been saying the movie only got made b/c the main producer is sleeping with the writer (both guys) and THR also confirmed that.

[starstruck]

damn, nicole. draggin.

[ririlurker]

Originally posted by HausofCherry

source

I never thought I'd say this, but I'm starting to feel bad for Christina. This really isn't her year...

[Nicole]

They shot two entirely different first 30 minutes for the film. Just a couple months ago they were test screening both cuts at Sony to see which to go with.

I'm not lying to make the movie look bad, I've also pointed out the positives.