| |
Discussion: U.S. Election 2016
Member Since: 3/7/2011
Posts: 8,251
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RatedG²
Yes, Hillary received the most negative coverage out of all presidential candidates this year
Another source to prove that
I even have a third
That's not debatable. Maxx is correct |
"The Shorenstein Center study is based on an analysis of thousands of news statements by CBS, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post."
Yeah it's pretty debatable, having a hard time trusting these receipts. They hardly cite any examples  And negative coverage of Clinton is related to the General Public perception. People don't like her. I was talking about how the major news outlets obviously treat Hillary better.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2010
Posts: 71,871
|
Quote:
Originally posted by hairofglory
"The Shorenstein Center study is based on an analysis of thousands of news statements by CBS, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post."
Yeah it's pretty debatable, having a hard time trusting these receipts. They hardly cite any examples And negative coverage of Clinton is related to the General Public perception. People don't like her. I was talking about how the major news outlets obviously treat Hillary better. |
Okay but where are your receipts to prove otherwise? Because so far I've seen none and you only just said some things...
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/21/2012
Posts: 28,099
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RatedG²
Wait a minute
Goosey gave me that first link but this second link is cuter I think 
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/7/2011
Posts: 8,251
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RatedG²
Okay but where are your receipts to prove otherwise? Because so far I've seen none and you only just said some things...
|
Google News is my receipts An opinion piece on the front page of CNN/HP describing why Donald is racist, sexist, dangerous etc is not the same as an article about Hilary being under investigation because one is an opinion and the other is a real event.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2010
Posts: 71,871
|
Quote:
Originally posted by hairofglory
Google News is my receipts An opinion piece on the front page of CNN/HP describing why Donald is racist, sexist, dangerous etc is not the same as an article about Hilary being under investigation because one is an opinion and the other is a real event. |
That doesn't prove he gets more negative coverage than her. It just shows he made a dumb mistake this week
Clinton is the candidate with the most negative coverage since the race began, as sources corroborated
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/21/2012
Posts: 28,099
|
Well maybe if he didn't mock a disabled person or call Mexicans rapists or say women are pigs and don't work hard enough as men to justify not securing equal pay or that every country should have nuclear weapons, we wouldn't be calling him racist, sexist, and dangerous....
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/4/2010
Posts: 2,535
|
Can we ban RatedG? We all know he/she/it wants Trump to win
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2010
Posts: 71,871
|
Quote:
Originally posted by CannibalMonster
Can we ban RatedG? We all know he/she/it wants Trump to win
|
?
I mean let's say that's true. You want to ban someone for having a non Clinton opinion? That's hilariously outrageous
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/6/2014
Posts: 19,122
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/1/2013
Posts: 9,393
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RatedG²
Wait a minute
Goosey gave me that first link but this second link is cuter I think
|
I love how all these Canadians, Brits, Brazilians, Easter Europeans, etc. are so thirsty for a Trump win. As if that's going to be of any benefit to them.
Like, stay off our lawn
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 4/27/2012
Posts: 33,811
|
2014  Those emails hit her really hard.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/21/2012
Posts: 28,099
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RatedG²
?
I mean let's say that's true. You want to ban someone for having a non Clinton opinion? That's hilariously outrageous
|
I know you don't want Trump to win, but I assume he's saying you're trolling by acting like you support Hillary when you actually want her to fail. I guess he doesn't get your sense of humor when it comes to her "scandals" like I used to be. 
===
Hillary is loved around the world. The rest of the world, outside of Russia, North Korea and ISIS, fears a Trump presidency.
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 4/27/2012
Posts: 33,811
|
I posted about this a while ago but we all know I love political tea.
The story about Hillary being considered to replace Biden in 2012 is still so interesting to me. I just found a blind gossip post on it: http://blindgossip.com/?p=46661
It was widely speculated and you know what they say. When there's smoke, there's fire. Especially in politics. I 100% believe it happened but there's a lot of disputes on how. Some say it was just the people running Barack's campaign and he didn't actually know, some say Hillary turned it down because if Barack lost in 2012, she didn't wanna be attached to the losing campaign. I'm also interested in (but don't believe) the theory of how the Clinton's secretly wanted Obama to lose in 2012 because they thought it'd be easier for Hillary to run against an incumbent Republican. That way the campaign could be about bashing the current President's record, rather than having to defend and attach herself to Barack's record.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/20/2011
Posts: 3,218
|
Wait I'm confused, are the FBI investigating Clinton Foundation or nah?
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 3,371
|
Does anyone else think that NC could be bluer than OH, FL and IA? McCrory's unpopularity/bathroom bill + voter ID law struck down + a rapidly changing demographic with all of the NY/NJ transplants and a significant minority population.
OH and IA have a lot of those blue collar voters that like Trump and FL has a lot of rednecks in the northern area that could counter southern Florida.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/21/2012
Posts: 28,099
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Giselle
I posted about this a while ago but we all know I love political tea.
The story about Hillary being considered to replace Biden in 2012 is still so interesting to me. I just found a blind gossip post on it: http://blindgossip.com/?p=46661
It was widely speculated and you know what they say. When there's smoke, there's fire. Especially in politics. I 100% believe it happened but there's a lot of disputes on how. Some say it was just the people running Barack's campaign and he didn't actually know, some say Hillary turned it down because if Barack lost in 2012, she didn't wanna be attached to the losing campaign. I'm also interested in (but don't believe) the theory of how the Clinton's secretly wanted Obama to lose in 2012 because they thought it'd be easier for Hillary to run against an incumbent Republican. That way the campaign could be about bashing the current President's record, rather than having to defend and attach herself to Barack's record. |
I don't believe it.
Quote:
Originally posted by Mitch.
Wait I'm confused, are the FBI investigating Clinton Foundation or nah? |
There was speculation and consideration, but the DOJ said no because there is simply no evidence. Even if a probe does begin, it'll be after Hillary wins the presidency so we're good with that one term Queen. 
Quote:
Originally posted by Pirate Aaron
Does anyone else think that NC could be bluer than OH, FL and IA? McCrory's unpopularity/bathroom bill + voter ID law struck down + a rapidly changing demographic with all of the NY/NJ transplants and a significant minority population.
OH and IA have a lot of those blue collar voters that like Trump and FL has a lot of rednecks in the northern area that could counter southern Florida.
|
NC and FL are basically equal. Ohio and then Iowa last.
But yes NC is moving Democratic faster which is why we'll have the Senate, Governor, and president. FL is getting there, but the older people aren't dying fast enough. Ohio and Iowa are moving to the right. Iowa much faster than Ohio.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2010
Posts: 71,871
|
Quote:
Originally posted by King Maxx
I know you don't want Trump to win, but I assume he's saying you're trolling by acting like you support Hillary when you actually want her to fail. I guess he doesn't get your sense of humor when it comes to her "scandals" like I used to be.
===
Hillary is loved around the world. The rest of the world, outside of Russia, North Korea and ISIS, fears a Trump presidency. |
Oh I get it. Yeah true 
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 4/27/2012
Posts: 33,811
|
How different Hillary's image would be if she never gave Goldman Sachs speeches and didn't use her own email server
The American people are so... I hope her favorability goes up when she's POTUS.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/21/2012
Posts: 28,099
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Giselle
How different Hillary's image would be if she never gave Goldman Sachs speeches and didn't use her own email server
The American people are so... I hope her favorability goes up when she's POTUS. |
It would've been slightly better, but Benghazi.......
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/6/2014
Posts: 19,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
