They should ask her. I'm very sure she'd say she would support Sanders if he were the nominee. I'm sure Sanders would support her too but he hasn't said that, he just skated around the question smh
Yeah but that's because he doesn't want to support Clinton, he wants to win. It's honestly just a bit disrespectful to ask him that when he's still in the race.
And I don't see anyone mad about Kasich and Cruz basically saying the same thing about Trump.
Yeah but that's because he doesn't want to support Clinton, he wants to win. It's honestly just a bit disrespectful to ask him that when he's still in the race.
And I don't see anyone mad about Kasich and Cruz basically saying the same thing about Trump.
Oh but that's because except for a plurality of republicans the vast majority hate Trump . I don't blame them too
It might be disrespectful but almost every election year the second place candidate (or more) have been asked this so it's not a slight at Sanders specifically.
Girl the only way Hillary would be unviable in California is if she dies. Not even joking.
.
I still feel like the triple punch of NY-PA-MD wraps this up. There just isn't enough delegates left (short of viability issues) that Sanders can scoop up to win it if she wins those 3 states by at least 10 points
Larry Sabato, well-renowned political analyst/pundit from the University of Virginia's Center for Politics and founder of the website Larry Sabato's Crystal Ball just updated his race ratings for the first time in over a year, to account for the likelihood of a Clinton vs. Trump match-up. The result:
Quote:
Election analysts prefer close elections, but there was nothing we could do to make this one close. Clinton’s total is 347 electoral votes, which includes 190 safe, 57 likely, and 100 that lean in her direction. Trump has a total of 191 (142 safe, 48 likely, and 1 leans).
Over the years we’ve put much emphasis on the seven super-swing states: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Virginia. While some will fall to the Democrats less readily than others, it is difficult to see any that Trump is likely to grab. In fact, four normally Republican states (Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, and Missouri) would be somewhat less secure for the GOP than usual. North Carolina, which normally leans slightly to the GOP, would also be well within Clinton’s grasp in this election after being Mitt Romney’s closest win in 2012.
The probability is that the Clinton campaign will target at least one or two of the four Likely Republican states, which would have the effect of helping Democratic Senate nominees where they exist (all of those states have Senate races in November). Because Clinton’s objectives will surely include recapture of the Senate, no doubt her campaign will keep in mind the competitive contests that could yield the net four seats for a tied Senate or five seats for outright Democratic control.
I still feel like the triple punch of NY-PA-MD wraps this up. There just isn't enough delegates left (short of viability issues) that Sanders can scoop up to win it if she wins those 3 states by at least 10 points
I literally say a prayer begging for this to happen every night.
I still feel like the triple punch of NY-PA-MD wraps this up. There just isn't enough delegates left (short of viability issues) that Sanders can scoop up to win it if she wins those 3 states by at least 10 points
It's already "basically wrapped up"
But it won't be over until California
Yup Bernies gonna beat Hillary in her home state, where she's served two terms as senator, has amazing approval ratings, brought the city back to life after 9/11, has earned the respect & endorsements of nearly every political figurehead/magazine & journal and where she lives. Dream the heck on.
. I don't blame them too 
.
