Quote:
Originally posted by heckinglovato
Off-topic to your concern about voter "enthusiasm", you flipped the topic and pointed Hillary as a victim.
Had these caucuses have been blowouts in favor of Clinton, we wouldn't have heard a single shred of complaint from your side of the aisle. i.e. The Democratic Super-delegate System.
Have a nice day.  |
Maybe you don't get it. Why are the republicans only attacking Hillary? Why aren't their adds being run against Bernie? Why is everything focused on Hillary? Because the republicans know Bernie is an easy target. His support of the soviet union, apparent socialism, castro support and so many other things people don't know about make him totally vulnerable in a general election. People know that Hillary is the strongest candidate and thats why the republicans are doing everything they can so that she won't win. I guarantee you that should Bernie win, the republicans will win the white house. Despite what the national polls may say, they don't take into account all of the things that the Repubs will hold against Bernie. Keep that in mind. I have absolutely nothing against Bernie, but everyone knows Hillary is the stronger, more diverse candidate. Bernie is solely focused on one main issue--an issue that is important but not nearly as important as many of the other crisis's that America is facing. Have a nice day as well~~~
I was saying that they kept implying it was okay for team X to sweep in a given state as long as team Y is expecting it, like.. no... team Y is still losing in that state.
And yes, a 1% Bernie loss in NY is still a loss in NY, that's exactly what I'm saying and exactly the type of argument I'm presenting against "we expected that so it's okay 
" type of mentality.
