My question is... Let's say Hillary gains 80-100 delegates onto her lead (leading Bernie by 300 delegates by the end of the night), but loses to Bernie in Ohio and Missouri... How can people say that Bernie wins and that he is still in the race when at that point it IS literally impossible for him to win? I don't get it.
Honestly I think it's strictly for momentum and the possibility of eventually winning California and New York for some reason. I kinda don't get either since by that time the primary race would be done. It's all up to Bernie if he would continue or not, giving his fans false hope.
Honestly I think it's strictly for momentum and the possibility of eventually winning California and New York for some reason. I kinda don't get either since by that time the primary race would be done. It's all up to Bernie if he would continue or not, giving his fans false hope.
I just hate it. It sucks that she couldn't have scraped out Michigan... No one would even be worrying about this. I wish we knew she was the nominee because it's so stressful not knowing what's going to happen.
It is the most important state for the general too. Who our next president is basically all rests on who Ohio votes for. For Republicans especially, (since they win all the small, rural states), they can never win an election without Ohio. Ohio has a ton of electoral votes. If a Democrat wins Ohio, it is impossible for a Republican to win. It will be really troubling for Hillary if Bernie beats her in Ohio next week.
not really...she won it in '08 & FL as well over Obama and still lost the nomination. and Obama went on to win both in GE.
The other thing I DONT understand. Everyone saying the competition in states like Illinois, North Carolina and Ohio is so close... Then WHY DONT polls reflect that??? It's so misleading that she's winning in all of these polls and I think if they are all wrong again, then the people conducting the polls should be investigated because they are HIGHLY misleading.
The other thing I DONT understand. Everyone saying the competition in states like Illinois, North Carolina and Ohio is so close... Then WHY DONT polls reflect that??? It's so misleading that she's winning in all of these polls and I think if they are all wrong again, then the people conducting the polls should be investigated because they are HIGHLY misleading.
Aren't these polls just a possible way things might go? I don't think anyone expect them to be 100%. Especially if a candidate pour more resources since the last polling or whatever.
Quote:
Originally posted by Shawn
32+ arrests already. Protesters stomping on American flags, waving guns around (legal open carry), fist-fighting security guards.
I just wanna see a win in NC, Florida and Ilinois!
Hopefully she keeps it close for Ohio and Missouri
Literally, if she wins those 3 states and Florida big.... She is the nominee..it bothers me so much that Bernie will likely continue to campaign even after that.
Aren't these polls just a possible way things might go? I don't think anyone expect them to be 100%. Especially if a candidate pour more resources since the last polling or whatever.
Holy ****. Not going to Chicago this weekend
No, they are supposed to be very accurate and all of them have been thus far (excluding Michigan).
The other thing I DONT understand. Everyone saying the competition in states like Illinois, North Carolina and Ohio is so close... Then WHY DONT polls reflect that??? It's so misleading that she's winning in all of these polls and I think if they are all wrong again, then the people conducting the polls should be investigated because they are HIGHLY misleading.
Well the margin of error, including undecided voters, etc...from a statistical point of view they automatically have a high tendency to fluctuate and it's really hard for polls to be representative in a way that they include all demographics.
Protesters stomping on American flags, waving guns around (legal open carry), fist-fighting security guards.
It won't be long until someone is murdered.