Quote:
Originally posted by LoveTheWayILie
For the love of god, most of her discography is produced by Luke and you think she will have same "success" without him thanks to a forgotten horrible song with mediocre sales that was a collab with 3HO3!  Why are you making me point this out  I don't want to be this mean to her  I'd rather drag Bruno whose creativity is as limited as Madonnas remaining life span. |
What's so hard to understand? Her discography being mostly Luke songs is NOT indicative of her eventual lack of success without him, but IS indicative of his controlling nature? GP literally gives no ****s about who produces a song. They won't know or even care that Kesha, Katy Perry, Kelly Clarkson, P!nk, Flo Rida and Nicki Minaj have all had songs by the same producer.
Luke needs Kesha, not the other way 'round. The second most successful artist on Luke's label is Becky ****ing G, that's the only reason why he hasn't dropped Kesha yet. He's still hopeful that she'll come crawling back to him and release his basic pop tunes so he can get a quick dollar. He makes more money from Kesha than he does from artists he just produces for (Katy Perry/Nicki Minaj) in terms of the percentage gain of all profits. That's his angle. He's nothing but a money hungry rapist pig and she's standing up against this. You really have the gall to argue against that and put her down for wanting to take back control of her own life and career?
Think before you speak.
An undeniable one. Let's not get started on Woo Hoo!
The rest would have all been at least Take It Off sized, or Waking Up In Vegas sized.