Quote:
Originally posted by Bounce
You just said your past doesn't count, your current work is what's important.
Are you backtracking??? Madonna did all of these things in the past, decades ago, etc..
|
Madonna didn't revolutionize the industry through music alone. It was a combination of her performances, imagery, etc. Give me a call when Gaga does that. I am not backtracking, but reach though. See artists like Brandy or Nelly Furtado that have had like 1-2 enormous eras and look where they are now.
I mean, it'd be delusional to even think that Madonna isn't an A-Lister even if it weren't for those receipts (go outside and ask someone about her :lol
, but okay lol.
Quote:
Originally posted by Bounce
You just to be an A List, your music must be recognized.
Winning a GRAMMY = being recognized.
|
Yes, it needs to be recognized by a panel of dozens of old men. Sir Georg Solti and Alison Krauss have respectively 31 and 27 Grammys but I don't see their music being as widely recognized as Madonna's?
Quote:
Originally posted by BudBud
bye! gaga was already in the A range the oscar performance just solidified that - rita and jen havent been a listers yet (well jen when she was big but that was ages ago)
|
One minute Gaga is an A-lister because she was asked to perform at the Oscars, now she already was an A-Lister but cemented it at the Oscars. Are the Little Monsters backtracking?
OT: No, she isn't!