[keshaspearsxo]

Originally posted by Saint

Well if you don't understand the concept then don't comment on it.
You're such a bitter little bitch making everything such a big deal. Chill the **** out for once in your life.

Anyway, as of right now it doesn't even matter who she works with just as long as we get new music. Hopefully she'll go to a different label like Republic or Capitol. Somewhere that'll actually take advantage of the multiple sides of Kesha and not just have her painted as the "party fun girl"

if u cannot handle the pear do not bite the pear do not buy a pear do not look at the pear and do not even go to the fruit section.

ps. u do not know me + own ur stupidity

[B2R4D]

I've never understood the demand for her to record with Calvin and Zedd. Why did we advocate so hard for her "creative control", only for her to then record dance-pop music that perpetuates the belief that she only does "party" songs?

Musically, Calvin and Zedd won't do that much more for her than what Dr. Luke did.

[keshaspearsxo]

Originally posted by B2R4D

I've never understood the demand for her to record with Calvin and Zedd. Why did we advocate so hard for her "creative control", only for her to then record dance-pop music that perpetuates the belief that she only does "party" songs?

Musically, Calvin and Zedd won't do that much more for her than what Dr. Luke did.

very true. proof: look at zedd's new song.

[Crazy kid]

Originally posted by keshaspearsxo

if u cannot handle the pear do not bite the pear do not buy a pear do not look at the pear and do not even go to the fruit section.

ps. u do not know me + own ur stupidity

I really want to sig this

[Aurora]

You can make fun dance music without it lyrically being about partying. I stanned for Kesha because of TiK ToK and Take It Off, not Dirty Love and Wonderland.

Plus at least Calvin and Zedd wouldn't force her to record songs and put them on her album. If they did a collaboration that they mutually liked, it would be great.

[keshaspearsxo]

Originally posted by Crazy kid

I really want to sig this

anything is an improvement from what u already have

[keshaspearsxo]

Originally posted by Sam 

You can make fun dance music without it lyrically being about partying. I stanned for Kesha because of TiK ToK and Take It Off, not Dirty Love and Wonderland.

this is what ignorant kesha stans say

if u believe this u r not a kesha stan. u are a dr luke stan / a stan for those songs. but do not label urself a kesha STAN if u are not about that life.

[Aurora]

lol I stan for her demos and album tracks that aren't Luke produced too. I stan for Dinosaur. I love her upbeat electropop music and that will never be indicative of Dr. Luke. I don't care who she works with, so long as the next record isn't full of Wonderlands because I will not like the album (even though this won't happen). But even then I still will stan because she has 2 other great albums and 1 great EP and a ton of great demos.

Plus Dr. Luke produced Wonderland and Dirty Love so your point is kind of moot.

[ks_dollar]

Originally posted by B2R4D

I've never understood the demand for her to record with Calvin and Zedd. Why did we advocate so hard for her "creative control", only for her to then record dance-pop music that perpetuates the belief that she only does "party" songs?

Musically, Calvin and Zedd won't do that much more for her than what Dr. Luke did.

Calvin's and Zedd's productions aren't interesting most of the time either.

[Aurora]

Zedd doesn't really seem the right fit for Kesha imo. I like him enough, just not for Kesha. A Kesha/Calvin collab might be okay though.

[keshaspearsxo]

Originally posted by Sam 

lol I stan for her demos and album tracks that aren't Luke produced too. I stan for Dinosaur. I love her upbeat electropop music and that will never be indicative of Dr. Luke. I don't care who she works with, so long as the next record isn't full of Wonderlands because I will not like the album (even though this won't happen). But even then I still will stan because she has 2 other great albums and 1 great EP and a ton of great demos.

Plus Dr. Luke produced Wonderland and Dirty Love so your point is kind of moot.

not true, matt squire produced dirty love and luke threw his name on it. it's probably the same for a lot of her songs.

[Aurora]

I know this but there are subtle differences from the demo and you still said that I only stan for Dr. Luke which obviously isn't true.

Like I know you're just being Pears and not being serious but it's still something I have to point out. I don't really care if/want them to be on the album (Zedd and Calvin) but I was just stating a fact that they are different from Luke in that they wouldn't be forcing her to make music she didn't want to. If she wanted to collab with them, it would be cool. Plus she doesn't have to sing about partying over a Calvin Harris beat if she doesn't want to.

[Saint]

FREEDOM RIDEEE!!!!!!

[B2R4D]

Originally posted by Sam 

You can make fun dance music without it lyrically being about partying. I stanned for Kesha because of TiK ToK and Take It Off, not Dirty Love and Wonderland.

Plus at least Calvin and Zedd wouldn't force her to record songs and put them on her album. If they did a collaboration that they mutually liked, it would be great.

Obviously this is true, but does that mean that "Sweet Nothing", "We Found Love", "Feel So Close", "Outside", "Clarity" and other Calvin and Zedd tracks aren't considered "party" songs because they don't literally refer to partying?

My point is that lyrics are irrelevant. Any song with super-radio-friendly-dance-fuelled production will likely perpetuate the same old "party girl" image that everyone so desperately wants her to break away from. That's just how it is.

[Saint]

Ugh listening to Warrior is such a bittersweet thing.
It deserved so much more success cause it's so good.

[keshaspearsxo]

Originally posted by Sam 

I know this but there are subtle differences from the demo and you still said that I only stan for Dr. Luke which obviously isn't true.

Like I know you're just being Pears and not being serious but it's still something I have to point out. I don't really care if/want them to be on the album (Zedd and Calvin) but I was just stating a fact that they are different from Luke in that they wouldn't be forcing her to make music she didn't want to. If she wanted to collab with them, it would be cool. Plus she doesn't have to sing about partying over a Calvin Harris beat if she doesn't want to.

Calvin / Zedd songs are still party music not matter the lyrics. It is designed for the club and festival scene. Therefore, it is party music, whether you like it or not.

[CroNich]

Originally posted by B2R4D

I've never understood the demand for her to record with Calvin and Zedd. Why did we advocate so hard for her "creative control", only for her to then record dance-pop music that perpetuates the belief that she only does "party" songs?

Musically, Calvin and Zedd won't do that much more for her than what Dr. Luke did.

Except 80% of their dance tracks are about other things then partying.

[Saint]

Just because Calvin (not even including Zedd cause idc for him) makes club oriented music doesn't mean that that would be the product of him working with Kesha, if they worked together.

[Ryanicorn]

OK, y'all

[ks_dollar]

Originally posted by CroNich

Except 80% of their dance tracks are about other things then partying.

Originally posted by B2R4D

Obviously this is true, but does that mean that "Sweet Nothing", "We Found Love", "Feel So Close", "Outside", "Clarity" and other Calvin and Zedd tracks aren't considered "party" songs because they don't literally refer to partying?

My point is that lyrics are irrelevant. Any song with super-radio-friendly-dance-fuelled production will likely perpetuate the same old "party girl" image that everyone so desperately wants her to break away from. That's just how it is.

.