It really depends how you look at it. It doesn't means that #20 is more successful than #5 for example, or that #10 is more successful than #16.
#20: 10 million albums, 2 million singles
#5: 5 million albums, 20 million singles
#10: 1 million albums, 1 million singles
You see? The ranking isn't about who is more successful. It's just about the balance between the success (even if it is moderate success) of their albums and singles.
Very true, her albums and singles both underperfomed equally. No shade intended. Both her albums and singles didn't do well in the last few years.
So as you guys see, this is just a simple balance. And it can be good or bad the way you look at it. In this case it's bad for Christina because both her album and singles had minimum success.
It really depends how you look at it. It doesn't means that #20 is more successful than #5 for example, or that #10 is more successful than #16.
#20: 10 million albums, 2 million singles
#5: 5 million albums, 20 million singles
#10: 1 million albums, 1 million singles
You see? The ranking isn't about who is more successful. It's just about the balance between the success (even if it is moderate success) of their albums and singles.
Very true, her albums and singles both underperfomed equally. No shade intended. Both her albums and singles didn't do well in the last few years.
So as you guys see, this is just a simple balance. And it can be good or bad the way you look at it. In this case it's bad for Christina because both her album and singles had minimum success.
I was going to say this but I was afraid to. But, initially, this is what her position implies.
But, initially, this is what her position implies.