Quote:
Originally posted by Vin
Looks like I'm being dragged into another public trial.
I'm seeing double standards and flip flopping on Nicknames:
So:
Legend X
Queen Bey
Goddess Lana
These are acceptable...
But Ke$ha Christ is not?
That's what we call a double standard, friends.
What's the difference between saying Ke$ha Christ and Goddess ______, a deity is still being assigned to both names; it doesn't matter whether you say Goddess Lana, Vishnu Rihanna, or Ke$ha Christ. According to the rules, all three are acceptable, seeing as all three do not contain mangled versions of artist's names, which has been discussed over and over and over again in this thread. The rule was made pretty crystal clear by several moderators -- no mangled names.
It's the very reason why Legend X, Queen Bey, Goddess Lana, and Ke$ha Christ are acceptable, but Legendtina, Queenyoncé, Godlana, and Ke$hus are not acceptable. The rule is clear cut. Thus, a reversal is clearly in order, here.
...Vin
|
Way to make a case
Now lemme follow suit. I have come for the last time to debate the unjustness of my WP for a smiley.
Here we have my post:
http://atrl.net/?p=11764215
Warned quiet swiftly and suddenly for being "off topic". Please bare in mind that
I define the poster as I am the Thread Maker. And member that I replied to was technically the one who was "offtopic"
But this post:
http://atrl.net/?p=11787366
Is identical and was reported yesterday and the WP was withheld.
Now, I do see how my post could be viewed as "shady" but there are other ways to interpret that post and they way I had written it wasn't intended to be shady. Not to mention, people don't get WP just simply for being shady. I believe a reverse is in order?