I'm sure he hasn't given any money to charity (something Gaga has done numerous times) and is also probably one of those who used the "children starving in Africa" excuse when she wore the meat dress.
The fack, why don't give 10% of the coat's value to the children who are hungry
She's trolling the very same critics who bashed her for the Meat Dress and claimed that she could have fed starving children with the meat. PETA will never understand fashion.
"I’M SICK OF THE PUBLIC OWNING MY IMAGE. MY HAIR IS MINE AND THEY KILLED THE BLONDE. THE BROWN WILL STAY UNTIL THEY KILL HER TOO."
-Gaga, in LM.com chat a few minutes ago.
Isn't there a contradiction here? If she really was taking control of her image wouldn't she stay blonde no matter what the public tried to do with it?
Don't tell me this belongs in the LM.com thread. When stars tweet something, it gets its own thread; we don't have to keep everything in a "[_____]'s Twitter Updates" thread. If she'd tweeted this, it would be cause for a new thread. Just because Gaga's on her own social network shouldn't mean the information needs to be contained to what amounts to a second Lady Gaga Base thread.
Well this kind of stuff seems more appropriate for the LM.com thread. I dont agree with her actually giving out album deets being posted just in there though.
This is the kind of stuff that doesn't deserve its own thread...
We can have threads when she changes her hair color and each time she tweets about changing her hair color, but not when she talks about why she did it, just because she said it on LM.com instead of twitter?