Love both albums, but BTW is the superior album. In terms lf diversity, lyrics, and artistry. FF triumphs BTW in terms of production because half of BTW sounds like it was recorded with a tape recorder, and mixed with a potatoe.

Born This Way

FF

what.....a.......shock

Born This Way for all.

Femme Fatale is really good though, it's part of my Britney trinity along with Blackout and In the zone.

ditto

Femme Fatale because of How I Roll. A.K.A Rolling Stones' top song of 2011, and it wasn't even a single.



1. Britney Spears, "How I Roll"
Britney hooks up with the Swedish production duo Bloodshy and Avant, who also gave her "Toxic" in 2004 and "Piece of Me" in 2007, and like the first two chapters of the trilogy, it's fiendishly inventive girl noise. Every sound effect that jumps out of the mix – Brit slurring the word "speakerrrr," digital finger-snaps, a real beatbox pretending to be a human beatbox – builds the tension. There's even a plot: An ordinary girl sits in her lonely room, dreaming of party lights far away, wishing she could escape to a place where she can show her kneesocks and drink tequila on the rocks, where there's music and there's people and they're young and alive. But the mean old world won't let her break free, so she just sings along with the machines until she turns into a machine herself, because only the beat understands her. There's your story of pop music right there.

Source: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/ne...#ixzz46EpUg0f2

written by rob sheffield though.
might as well have been written by a britney stan from exhale

..and?

He must be doing something right if king ROLLING STONE is paying him and approving over his list to represent them.



#FemmeFatale&Deal

i love femme fatale
rob sheffield isnt credible though.
its like giving user Anticipating the platform to pump up britney spears' cred.
or giving ditaboy or swag the platform to pump up madonna lol

FF

Lol, I get you.

I understand your view of it, but Rolling Stone isn't some Buzzfeed sized stanfest. This article represents them as a whole and with any honorable publication, must be approved before posting. They trust him enough to make this judgement, and like I said, he must be doing something right since they have chosen him to represent them and pay him.

To be honest, reviews are only so credible. Its just one person with an opinion and/or an agenda. I dont see why RollingStone wouldn't approve his article. Why wouldn't they? Doesnt make it any less of a stanboy puff piece.

To clarify, I love Femme Fatale and How I Roll. However, I despise Rob Sheffield. I think hes a joke to pop journalism. Theyve allowed him to review her material in the past, but truthfully they shouldn't. He is seriously anything but objective. He gave Britney Jean a glowing review. That says a lot.

That reviewer didn't lie though. How I Roll is godly.

This is beyond stupid. He still works for Rolling Stone which makes his opinion more credible than any ATRL user - Britney stan or not.

FF by light years

Femme Fatale.

BTW is my least favorite Gaga album. I only use MTN.

Its not stupid.
If it were some random Gaga stan writer from RS that wrote a few articles praising something shes done as genius im sure you'd be one of the first to call out the bias. And most of you do anytime anything positive is written about her. Rob Sheffield is not credible, rolling stone writer or not.

And can we not act like Rolling Stone is some beacon of musical knowledge at this point? You guys only give credit to these things when it suits your agendas.

What does it "say", exactly? It just shows that music is subjective.