Zunika had pleaded guilty in December last year to six counts under section 376A(1)(b) of the Penal Code for sexually assaulting the young girl using a sex toy. Section 376A(1)(b) criminalises the sexual penetration of a minor “with a part of A’s body (other than A’s penis) or anything else”.

In a landmark judgment on the six charges for which Zunika was acquitted, Justice Kan Ting Chiu said the particular section of the law under which she was charged “does not cover women as offenders”.

“The reference to a person who has a penis cannot be construed to include a woman without doing violence to common sense and anatomy”, he added, noting that the law is clearly not gender-neutral and that “we should be slow to suggest or infer the contrary.”

Source: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/...l/2688688.html

Yeah, a lot of sexual assault laws are specifically about forced penetration and don't include any other kind of sexual acts, which is moronic. this situation even did involve penetration, but because it wasn't natural it doesn't count? stupid. I wonder if she had digitally penetrated the girl, would that count under the law?

Please tell me that this article is just poorly written and that penetrating a minor with your penis is not actually legal

thx for the response

oh thats covered in another part of the section