Not sure if anyone knows about this.
x



If this were about killing/genocide of African Americans or Muslims liberals would be outraged and he'd forced to answer as to why he spoke at such a vile, barbaric event. He's running for president and supports people who wish to mass kill gay people. What is going on?

Yup, I remember this from a while back. It's disgusting.

This man is hated by everyone, including his fellow Republican senators.

Didn't he just win the Iowa caucus? Can't be that hated.

A reach

No, he's hated by everyone on the hill. The Republican base even likes Trump over Cruz.

Iowa also voted for Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee. That says more about what terrible people live in Iowa than anything else, really.

Not at all. They wouldn't dare invite or speak at KKK events or antisemite events. But somehow it's acceptable to attend and support this kind of violent call to arms against a tiny marginal minority? It should be a scandal but it's not. Liberals don't care.

This is three months old and it did get press. In fact, Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee all responded to criticism about them attending the National Religious Liberties Conference, which wasn't exactly an "anti-gay" conference (but it might as well have been).

Is this a joke? The media shows a much bigger response to homophobia than Islamophobia. Mainstream publications feature stories about anti-gay attacks all the time, but there's little to no coverage on stories like Sikhs getting attacked because they were mistaken for Muslims.

And I don't know why you're outraged at liberals when Ted Cruz is a conservative candidate. Why is it shocking news that 3 Republican candidates would participate in something called the National Religious Liberties Conference? Republicans are always going on and on about "religious freedom" of Christians being supposedly threatened thanks to LGBT rights.

Disgusting.

But true everyone hates him, even his own daughter. Someone post the gif

They responded to none of it and dodged all questions the very few times they were asked. The liberal media literally does not care that 3 presidential candidates support a man who wants to get them elected so he can have them pass his genocide and reformation bills.

Ridiculous, galling lies. "Islamaphobia" is in the media every day and every candidate has to watch their language around words like "terrorism" or even "islamist". None of them have dared speak to such virulent and explicitly violent rhetoric regarding any of these groups that liberals coddle.

And the reason I'm bashing liberals over this is because they are the ones who claim to care but don't. Conservatives are now expected to be this way because of liberals allowing this to go unnoticed and unreported on.

No one likes Cruz lol

Cruz is a mess, but why do people always have to make comments like "If X said this about Y group, then people would be outraged!!!!" It makes it seem like you're more concerned about being more "oppressed" than other groups than you are about the actual discrimination. It just distracts from the actual issue. Just saying

It's an accurate observation get over it. People always get so hurt when gays stand up and point out hypocrisy. We're supposed to just fall in line and be happy y'all wear a rainbow pin on your facebook avi's in June

Meanwhile there's people trying to pass laws to kill/reform gay children, adults etc. and it's crickets. I'm sleep.

Actually, they responded and said they had no idea the pastor said those things before. You clearly did not read their responses. As for "liberal media," clearly they did care since they're the ones who asked and published all those articles pointing out that those 3 (only one is still a presidential candidate) attended a conference set up by an anti-gay pastor. Finally, it's ridiculous to actually think that Ted Cruz or the two others would ever would be pass a bill that advocates the death of gays. Logic clearly evades so I'm not surprised that you're delusional.

None of the things I said are lies and it's no surprise you couldn't actually respond to the example I used. I pointed to the fact that the media doesn't cover the harassment and even physical attacks Sikhs have been the receiving regularly due to Islamophobia. Using your delusional logic, they'd be getting heavy press coverage, but I see none. Again, where are these examples of the media "coddling" Muslims? If any group gets "coddled" by liberals, it's gays.

And it's amusing you're using me of presenting "ridiculous galling lies" when it's your claim that Republicans are afraid to be Islamophobic. If your reasoning is that they avoid words like "terrorism" (they don't), Republican candidates also avoid being openly virulent towards gays. Attending a "religious freedom" conference set up by a homophobic pastor who called for the death of gays does not equate to those candidates actually actually saying those things.

Conservatives are expected to be this way because anti-gay rhetoric fits the demographic they pander to. Liberals have nothing to do with it, and for the last time, clearly liberals care since they're the ones who reported that those three Republicans attended an "anti-gay" religious freedom conference. Your assertion is illogical since liberal media is the one who dubbed it "anti-gay" and confronted them about the pastor's earlier comments calling for the death of gays. And it's even more illogical to claim that liberals are more interested in Islamophobia than homophobia when that's clearly not true and you've failed to present any evidence for that outlandish, delusional claim.

Finally, I don't know why you're putting quotes around Islamopobia as if it doesn't exist. If a non-Muslim man like a Sikh is beaten or even murdered because people thought he was a Muslim, what would be a more appropriate term than Islamophobia? People think they're Muslims and they get attacked. Pretty simple.

Who said it did? But shouldn't it be of note that presidential candidates winning major caucus votes are dodging questions regarding their violent rhetoric towards a tiny, marginal minority that regularly deals with enough violence and brutality? Instead, liberal media has completely ignored it unlike other off hand comments people like Trump made about mexicans and muslims.

This man attended an event that revolved around anti-gay policy making including a genocide call to arms against them. Media was dead silent other than Maddow.

Liberals asked one or two questions and went home. I wouldn't even call that partly attempting their due diligence as reporters. They just didn't care to press the issue and accepted that candidates supporting such trash was ok to ignore.

You just did this with anti-gay.

Here's your reply.

****ing idiot.
too bad Jeb Bush is out of the race...