love her ill watch this

She manages to make sense out of everything! Love her

I love her videos so much

I didn't get too far, but she's wrong about "free" being used to refer to white people throughout all early 17th century, as a large amount of the initial slavery in British colonies was made up of white indentured servants (and there actually were a small number of black plantation owners in the VERY early colonies) who were in absolutely no ways free. This primarily changed as the colonies grew larger, as indentured servants had to be set free after a significant number of time (along with being paid in land, which was becoming less easy to hand out)whereas African slaves required no such treatment, and it's around this time "black" became associated with "slavery" in the British colonies/ "White" and "free" were never synonymous, as there were other free races/groups, such as the Native Americans. They were also very aware of Indian and Asian people, and many more.

"White" is a word that has also been used as far back as the Elizabethan era (ditto for "black"), and she also misses out on a lot of the racist context of both terms at the time (white was basically used to mean "clean" while black was "stained or dirty," so it was an incredibly racist insult in those time periods and "black" was seen as a highly negative thing) She is correct about Christianity being heavily associated with white, however

TLDR: She needs to fact check a little more. These differences aren't seemingly massive, but they create a massively different context.

Kat is antisemitic but nice video.

That's all the reason I need to avoid watching her stuff

Is she really? Never heard of her before I saw this thread, but I can't believe people support that

I never heard of this. Source?

!

Receipts?

"History of Whiteness"

???

I'll watch this later, but i hope the whole "melting pot" only referring to different white European nationalities melting to one white American race is mentioned.

Bingo - that's exactly what she says (iirc, my short-term memory is awful)

I don't know who she is but her criticism of the education system seems pretty rational here: http://katblaque.tumblr.com/post/134...d-antisemitism

Morons accuse her of being antisemitic because she said that the Holocaust is the only genocide studied in school on a global scale, which is the truth.

That's the only tea I could find on her "antisemitism' which isn't even that, so no - she's not antisemitic!

Honestly... it really comes across as pretty anti-semitic. That doesn't mean there is NOTHING of any kind of truth in there, but the post is very obviously a thinly veiled attempted to pull the focus of the Holocaust OFF of Jewish people because they get "too much" attention. The "anti-semitisim" is an overused phrased when I literally never hear it used reflects HORRIBLY on her as well. She's also ignoring that Jews were targeted far more on a statistical level, and that Hitler often blamed Jews, REGULARLY, in his speeches. And that Germany had a VERY long history of anti-Semitic politicians inspiring nationalism by scapegoating Jews.

Also, not that what was done to Native Americans was right. AT ALL (and I have never in my entire life seen it taught as justified) But "genocide" is not the accurate term to use. Both sides had members who slaughtered each other, and both sides had members who wanted nothing more than peace. It was warring cultures (with racism thrown in). As for African genocide, it kinda makes sense American History wouldn't cover that in detail. We did have slavery, but we didn't commit any genocides in Africa (and it wasn't done here, seeing as they were kept as slaves and you can't use slave labor if said slaves are dead)

It's how she said it. And she also said anti-semitisim is an overused phrase when someone accused her of being anti-semitic, which tends to imply someone is anti-semitic

""Antisemitism"" is the new reserve racism.