gaga lawyer

Lady Gaga lawyer Charles Ortner wrote in his response that the arrangement was ''structured in such a way as to mask its true purpose -- to provide to the defendants unlawful compensation for their services as unlicensed employment agents.''

Ortner wrote that Fusari and his company violated statutes that prohibited them from ''acting as employment agents without a license and charging Lady Gaga an unlawful fee for their purported services
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010...Lady-Gaga.html

fusari

i don't get the funny?

^ fusari hasn't a license

what he said is just nothing

no papers no sue


plus if he acted without license i think he is going to have some problems

Lol Fusari is an idiot.

are u british? .. u always use 'hasn't' instead of 'doesn't have'..

love100 is Italian. What is wrong with saying 'hasn't'?

Paper gansta.
Making Gaga sign monkey papers, wtf!

kind of rare to hear for me

Nothing, just in the U.S. most people use the words does not have which results in the contraction doesn't have. But it is kind of weir because most people wouldn't say "Rob Fusari does have a license" they would just say "Rob Fusari has a license". However when you use it in the negative, most Americans would say "Rob Fusari does not (doesn't) have a license".