Discussion: would you be here for Scream 5?

TayLord

do you want another one to add to the iconic series?

Nasty Nas

YES & they need to bring Kirby back.

DanceForYou

As long as it's better than the fourth one, sure.

MM3

My favorite movies

I'd be here for it if it's AMAZING. But perhaps it's time to give Queen Sidney a break.

TayLord

Quote:

Originally posted by Nasty Nas

YES & they need to bring Kirby back.

yes, this!! I like to think she didn't die

iforgiveyou

As long as it gives an actual ending to the series.

ReginaPhalange

YAAAAAS

Nicole

No, only the first one was good and the last one was a disaster.

LovingYourCareer

If Kirby is alive, then yes.

They should also add Chloé Grace Moretz to the next.

mikeyace16

Only if Sidney is finally the killer AND Gale and Dewey are the first ones to be killed.

qurl

not after how they handled Scream 5.. how you gon book Kevin Williamson to serve Scream 1 & 2 level greatness and then just bring Ehren Kruger back to rewrite it into a Scream 3 sized mess..? ended up being the worst in the series

LovingYourCareer

Quote:

Originally posted by qurl

not after how they handled Scream 5.. how you gon book Kevin Williamson to serve Scream 1 & 2 level greatness and then just bring Ehren Kruger back to rewrite it into a Scream 3 sized mess..? ended up being the worst in the series

You seen Scream 5?

Fix it.

TayLord

i wonder what they would cover tho?
1 - horror movie cliche's in general
2 - the sequel
3 - the trilogy
4 - the reboot
5 - (???)

TayLord

people do to much on 4, i loved it, and thought it was second best of the series. I agree that Scream 3 was complete and utter **** tho

LaNathan

Quote:

Originally posted by TayLord

yes, this!! I like to think she didn't die

I'm pretty sure she was meant to stay alive based on the original scripts that leaked for Scream 4. Scream 4 was originally going to end with Jill being wheeled away and the police announcing that there was one survivor (either Kirby or Sidney). This would have made sense since this trilogy was supposed to move to a new group of people.

She's also the only character in the series to not have a full complete death scene (of the characters that have been killed so far). Just an FYI to give hope.

LovingYourCareer

Quote:

Originally posted by TayLord

people do to much on 4, i loved it, and thought it was second best of the series. I agree that Scream 3 was complete and utter **** tho

Now, some of us have to admit, 3 was funny.

But horrible.

Outlaws

LaNathan

Quote:

Originally posted by qurl

not after how they handled Scream 5.. how you gon book Kevin Williamson to serve Scream 1 & 2 level greatness and then just bring Ehren Kruger back to rewrite it into a Scream 3 sized mess..? ended up being the worst in the series

Kevin already said he wrote the scripts for the rest of the trilogy. Ehren was brought in basically to just change the ending without Kevin knowing last minute so he couldn't object since one of the Weinstein brothers wanted a complete ending rather than the original cliffhanger.

DanceForYou

Quote:

Originally posted by LaNathan

I'm pretty sure she was meant to stay alive based on the original scripts that leaked for Scream 4. Scream 4 was originally going to end with Jill being wheeled away and the police announcing that there was one survivor (either Kirby or Sidney). This would have made sense since this trilogy was supposed to move to a new group of people.

She's also the only character in the series to not have a full complete death scene (of the characters that have been killed so far). Just an FYI to give hope.

One survivor? I thought the original ending was when Jill was being taken off to the hospital with all the press surrounding her and whatnot? As in, she was supposed to live.

dman4life

I'd definitely be here for it and no I DON'T want any of the main characters to be killed or the killer. They really just need a really good story line. Also Kirby should not be the main character, she's not a fighter like Sidney is.