In this day and ago, it shouldn't be difficult to contain "ISIS". After all, they thrive off social fame. Perhaps, one brave soul should volunteer to be captured with a tracker inside them or something.

If you're going to beat them, you gotta play like them but better: one up. I have some ideas.

Share your ideas.

A sacrifice wouldn't go over too well. There would be people up in arms, even if the person did volunteer.
We just gotta trust that those in power are able to do their job correctly and quickly put a stop to this group that is unfortunately terrorizing people in all senses of the word. I know, the people in power sometimes do a **** job, but we can't take it upon ourselves and do something ourselves. It's not how these things work.

Eradicate ha

nuQe ha

Extinguish ha

This isn't a movie

We need to attack them full force with a sophisticated military operation. Bomb them into obliteration

tell Kim Jong Un to nuke them

Exterminate ha
Literally

Muslim, governmental and community leaders should continue their efforts in issuing fatwa, condemn and keep informing Muslims that they're religiously prohibited from joining ISIS. No amount of airstrikes will counter the group's recruitments.

It's not surprising that most people's first solution is violence, but that's what's causing the ISIS to brutally murder people.

If they were thousands of nuclear strikes from our unused Cold War stockpile? We currently have some 7,700 WMD warheads, the Russians have 8,500. But the Middle Eastern countries would be all be wiped out or left uninhabitable and people wouldn't stand for it, not to mention to oil lost - not practical.

It would be inhumane just to wipe out several countries and millions of people too.

I always try to keep an open mind with these events. It's not exactly fair for me to live in the western world and blame the opposition for everything and be outraged when they retaliate and kill our people. We too are killing theirs. It's just crazy..

I guess if I was better educated on the story, I'd be able to be objective. But who started what? It's a long history of war.

Obliterate ha!

With good reason. They're terrorists

The last thing we need to do is contemplate the use of nuclear weapons. We have enough of an arsenal without bringing about the end of the world.

Massive air strike drone attacks
Free meat pieces for everybody, ha!

I'm sure the innocent people who are caught in the crossfire may think differently. It's very one-sided and we only hear of the horrific events that have taken place in New York, London and Boston, and we (of course!) are going to be very bias.

I'm not going to go into detail because I really don't want to upset or infuriate people, but some were counter-attacks to our interference in other people's business. More than one is needed to start a war and it'll take more than one to stop it.

Bombing wouldn't end well. It could lead to a full blown war . The scapegoat would simply be to track them. What's a better idea that wouldn't = the lost of innocent civilians?

I'm of two minds.

Part of me wants to bomb them into pieces.

The other part of me thinks that maybe something can be done to set up an Islamic State for the minority they represent, but obviously not under their direction, and set up/ support a good gov't as we support Israel in so much as peace and prosperity is the main objective. That way, Muslims around the World can see that the U.S. and the Western World loves and supports people of all cultures and there will be less enthusiasm for violence and drastic force.

Though I know the latter will likely never ever happen