Mess. I'd be so paranoid esp cause I can't swim to save my life, literally.

They must make $1 million during like, 3 hours of operation. That's ridiculous

I'm sure they won't actually do it, but the fact that it was even proposed is a joke.

They probably thinking the chance of a plane crashing in sea/ocean is lower than a plane crashing on land.

Lemme boycott Qantas.

If you're not going to fly over water, why not.

Gotta save those coins.

...

And what if they were crashing near a lake or river... I think people would rather inflate it and jump into the water with that than jump onto land.

Well let me never fly on one of their planes

Let them do it and then crash into a body of water and get sued into oblivion.

oh wait
Nvm

They're in a lot of financial trouble atm, they're literally hemorrhaging money. Tho i agree, a massive safety cut in order to save a million measly dollars a year seems ridiculous

The Hudson river landing comes to mind

why are you guys complaining. ? they are a private company! they can do whatever the hell they want

i swear if some of you guys were in charge of this country you would make our nation tilt back from the free market.

Titanic teas.

No

Well with that attitude, why should Qantas bother servicing their fleet? They want to save money, that would do it. Like you said, they're a private company, who cares if it endangers passengers and crew

Luckily you're not in charge

well if you don't like it find another airliner ! isnt the free market awesome?

Your mentality is shocking