Nope. Unlike her peers, Britney actually has CHOREOGRAPHY. She doesn't just shake her ass or walk around, it involves technical stuff.

Some of it's remembrance is coated in nostalgia, but it was on point.

Yess as always

Yes.

But her fans cling onto her dancing well for those few years because what else is there?

It's definitely overrated but ... Gaga? Gaga, while at a disadvantage since she actually sings live, has never danced half as good as Britney at her peak.

No, I honestly don't think it is.

Nope. Today's pop girls wish they could dance like that. I think it would be better to compare Gaga's dancing skills to Beyonce considering neither can dance well tbh.

the delusion

oh lord... prime Britney had amazing coreo... it was better than anything untill then... today, her danncing is overrsated as hell, I love her, but it's nothing special... put rimeney shouldn't be compared with gagas dancing

Not at all, she was truly an amazing dancer at her peak.

Britney in her prime could have easily been a backup dancer if not for her star status - she was extremely talented, and fluid. Not a single person was coming for her from 1998-2004. The only other pop star that could match was either Janet or Michael imo.

Also, it wasn't just the sheer effortless dancing, but rather her entire stage presence.

There honestly hasn't been a single person since that has been able to match her once renowned prowess. She was a sex goddess that could easily dance circles around any bitch.

/thread

Yes to much

She was good back then.
What is delusional is the fact some people still use the dancing argument to defend her.

Very. You'd think she was at the same level as Janet the way some cling on.

She wasn't bad though lol. But overrated in true fashion regarding anything Britney.

Not Britney is her prime.

Then: No, she slayed the game.
Now: Yes, it's embarrassing.

No. She was a good dancer and performer.