Nope. Not one lie.

No lies.

But Rihanna stans will just call him irrelevant, truth or not.

Im sorry but..

Wats the problem? He's telling the truth. Adam is the ONLY male popstar making the same type of pop music Britney and Madonna make. Not urban-pop/r&b like Beiber, Timberlake, Bruno, Usher and Chris Brown

Are you kidding? That's one big lie. "Reverse sexism" doesn't exist. What he's referring to is homophobia. There is plenty of overt sexuality from males in pop music and THERE ALWAYS HAS BEEN (Elvis? Michael Jackson? Usher? PRINCE? Are we serious people?!) and it's harmful and ignorant of him to say that.

Elvis caused a FIRESTORM of controversy and was banned from alot of places because of his legendary hips.

Michael Jackson has NEVER been overtly sexual and Prince is just 1 out of 1,000 male pop artists. Point proven! For every 1 Usher, there are 15 Britney's if you get what I'm saying.

The reason many people don't like gay male pop music is because they don't like the music. I don't know how or why that makes anybody homophobic, or "reverse sexist".

How is this any different from the mainstream pop we have now?

I don't get it.

Who says these women are "exploiting" themselves by releasing sexually charged songs and music videos? Do male rappers and R&B stars not sing incredibly explicit lyrics? Do they not grab their crotches on stage and parade around with a shirt on? Flash their abs on magazine covers?

Why is it that when a woman is free and in charge of her own sexuality and parlays it into music on her own terms she is exploiting herself? I find that kind of thinking is more sexist than anything.

Elvis had legions of fans throughout his career. The controversy helped him more than anything.
Michael may not have been overtly sexual as a person, but his image and music as a teen-young adult certainly was.

Honestly, no. And it's not like the Britney/Rihanna's of the world are in some kind of enviable position because they "get" (when the reality is that they're practically forced) to shake their asses on TV to get sales. The only way society accepts female sexuality is when men get to enjoy it. Pop music ITSELF relies on the objectification of women to survive.

These men we're talking about can invite girls backstage after concerts or have 5 alleged baby mamas and no one bats an eyelash, but Ke$ha and Rihanna are branded ****s for singing about enjoying sex? Why do you think Britney, Jessica Simpson, Taylor Swift and more had to pull the whole "virgin until marriage" act?

Pop music doesn't exist in a vacuum. The world would be completely fine with Adam and Sam being frank about sex if they were having sex with women.

I don't think it matters whether the male artist is gay or not. Sam specifically mentioned "male" artists. When men try to do provocative or shocking things, they will get more criticism than females, which sucks because it would make pop a lot more exciting. It has nothing to do with sexuality. Women have it easier when it comes to this topic.

The only thing you've said that I agree with.

Do they really? Any examples?

That's the only point I'm trying to make lol. It's not "reverse sexism," it's homophobia.

Not him doing Rihanna like that

I see

My king snatching the lessors

this gif is gross, at least Rihanna looks sexy when she does it