Back to ATRL
This is
Classic ATRL
, an interactive archive of our original website.
Music News
Charts
Videos
Celebria
Base
The Lounge
Best Of
YTT
Games
TRL Archive
User Name
Remember Me
Password
Members who joined ATRL prior to 2017, sign in here.
Any changes made to your password do not sync.
Classic ATRL
>
The Lounge
>
Poll: Hostel VS. Saw
Sign In
Poll: Hostel VS. Saw
View Poll Results
: Hostel VS. Saw
Hostel franchise
8
22.86%
Saw franchise
27
77.14%
Voters:
35
. You may not vote on this poll
Page 1 of 2
1
2
Next >
Last Post
Actions
dinorel
Member Since: 10/8/2011
Posts: 7,309
Thread Starter
|
Post #1
Hostel VS. Saw
2 bloody horror films franchises.
but which is better?
Hostel Franchise or Saw Franchise?
Sinister
Member Since: 11/17/2011
Posts: 52,363
Post #2
Saw should not be compared to Hostel...it is far superior
Amow.
Member Since: 5/11/2012
Posts: 408
Post #3
Hostel. Saw franchise should have stopped after the 2nd movie.
SLAYANNA NAVY
Member Since: 12/7/2011
Posts: 21,578
Post #4
Saw, I could never really get into Hostel that much
dinorel
Member Since: 10/8/2011
Posts: 7,309
Thread Starter
|
Post #5
Quote:
Originally posted by
castrobabytiger
Saw should not be compared to Hostel...it is far superior
I agree ... though I must say Saw 3D was pure trash.
, and Saw ll was boring.
but overall "Saw" is cool.... I totally praise the first film of the series
"Saw (part 1)" Sh*ts.
Lucas32
Member Since: 4/29/2012
Posts: 15,977
Post #6
Saw ****s over every other torture p0rn horror movie
MohammadMonster
Member Since: 5/28/2012
Posts: 3,178
Post #7
i prefer hostel
jomarr
Member Since: 4/25/2011
Posts: 41,661
Post #8
Saw.
Hostel is trash compared to Saw.
Siya
Member Since: 6/1/2011
Posts: 15,684
Post #9
They both suck and are not relativity "scary"..but Saw.
mariah.
Member Since: 4/27/2012
Posts: 2,072
Post #10
They both ruined the horror movie genre, but I guess Saw is better.
ReflectingGod
Member Since: 9/27/2011
Posts: 2,459
Post #11
Hostel, because at least they stopped before the series got ridiculously awful (even though the first 3 Saw films >> Hostel series).
dinorel
Member Since: 10/8/2011
Posts: 7,309
Thread Starter
|
Post #12
Quote:
Originally posted by
ReflectingGod
Hostel, because at least they stopped before the series got ridiculously awful (even though the first 3 Saw films >> Hostel series).
I must say Saw Vl is cool and actually became the best reviewed (by critics) Saw film in years.
I would say .. Saw , Saw lll and Saw VI are the best ones ... the other ones are just monotone and more of the same
Icing
Member Since: 12/27/2010
Posts: 6,041
Post #13
The first Hostel wasn't even bad. Two and three were appalling.
itsAllen
Member Since: 4/10/2011
Posts: 14,331
Post #14
Saw. Hostel is just disgusting, I can't watch.
Disco_Blisters
Member Since: 6/20/2012
Posts: 11,516
Post #15
Saw no question about it
Sinister
Member Since: 11/17/2011
Posts: 52,363
Post #16
Quote:
Originally posted by
ReflectingGod
Hostel, because at least they stopped before the series got ridiculously awful (even though the first 3 Saw films >> Hostel series).
they currently have 3 Hostels and I'm sure they are going to make more
jqnetto
Member Since: 5/1/2012
Posts: 10,570
Post #17
Saw.
B94
Member Since: 3/9/2011
Posts: 11,102
Post #18
Both
Katy V.!
Member Since: 8/16/2010
Posts: 19,703
Post #19
Hostel is awful, even ****tier than the last Saw movie
(I LOVED the previous ones
)
Feather
Member Since: 11/5/2009
Posts: 8,096
Post #20
Quote:
Originally posted by
ReflectingGod
Hostel, because at least they stopped before the series got ridiculously awful (even though the first 3 Saw films >> Hostel series).
Hotel should have stopped at 1.
Have you seen Hostel III? It was a Direct-to-DVD flop. Saw has never been direct to DVD
Page 1 of 2
1
2
Next >
Actions for this Thread
Print this Thread
"Absolute TRL" 1999-2006; "Popfusion" 2006-2007; "ATRL" 2007-present
, and Saw ll was boring.
"Saw (part 1)" Sh*ts.
(I LOVED the previous ones 
)