Would Lady Gaga be relevant without her gimmicks ?
In my opinion, the only time when the general public talks about Gaga is when she does something crazy like wearing a meat dress, weird performances, dressing like a man, the dark twisted videos and her weird vision of art and fashion.
My question is, would gaga be relevant (in the public eye) without her gimmicks.
No, the "crazy, high fashion outfits" are what makes her different.
But she wasn't relevant really when 'Just Dance' or 'Poker Face' went #1. So I'm going to say she wouldn't be AS relevant.
Probably. Her gimmicks are the entire foundation of her image and what makes her an exciting person to talk about and pay attention to, but who is to say her music couldn't carry her to some other height of relevance? She wasn't always the crazy chick with the stupid outfits. She started out riding on two hits that actually connected with the public, and nothing else.
With that said, she would definitely not be as popular now if she had not applied the gimmicks and the crazy performances. People could wish her to be a conventional pop star, but it is precisely the fact that she is not that made her the force that she is today.
In my opinion, the only time when the generic public talks about Gaga is when she does something crazy like wearing a meat dress, weird performances, dressing like a man, the dark twisted videos and her weird vision of art and fashion.
My question is, would gaga be relevant (in the public eye) without her gimmicks.
The meltdowns and repetitive threads are starting already, and the album is still months away. Y'all are unbelievable.