It's just a ****ing breast.

That's not the point. The child is 3 years old. The whole issue raised in the magazine was how old should a child be when breastfeeding is stopped. I think it's disgusting.

The breast isn't really what's causing controversy, it's the three year old boy attached to it.

If she were breastfeeding a newborn, it wouldn't be that controversial.

Ew, so tacky.

That's sick.

He's a bit old for that

Isn't that kid a little old? maybe that's what the article is about?

It's tacky but it's breastfeeding, it's not disgusting at all. Most of us are breastfed anyway, and why is it that when you pass a certain age it automatically becomes disgusting?

I would never allow my son to be breastfed at 3, but it doesn't really matter tbh, as long as the mom is fine with her nipple being mauled by teeth

I heard you still do that tho?

This just looks all kinds of wrong. I would feel so uncomfortable buying this because of the cover.

I guess it's to prove a point or something. Either way, her boob and presumably her kid. Doesn't bother me.

Well the whole point of the main article is to address that issue so the cover is fitting.

Breastfeeding is completely fine.

This cover is tacky in so many ways and is not representative of the issue.

Breastfeeding isn't sick

i don't see the problem

It becomes disgusting because they no longer need to rely on breast milk. This child is perfectly capable of eating real food. The reason children are breastfed (and bottle fed) is because they need liquid food at that age and it needs to contain vital nutrients and minerals.

I mean, my mother doesn't like it but sometimes I just really need it.

But the cover makes the whole thing even more disgusting. A simple article wouldn't be as bad as having a woman's exposed breast attached to the mouth of a 3 year old child. It's really tacky.