Not if it's already leaked

Yes, it sucks

I can't help but think of the missing Jesse McCartney album meant to come out January 2011 that's nowhere to be seen.

Yes...

But if its worthy like improve the production, tweaking a bit of little mistakes, etc..im good with

But if for the reason of poor 1st single, signs of underperforming..then

An album being pushed back usually spells disaster for its outcome, so yes I would care very much as it would have me worried about the fate of the album.

Pushbacks are terribly annoying but somehow they do end up building more hype for certain artists. Lil Wayne loves to do this.

I sometimes think pushbacks are dangerous because when one tries too hard to reach perfection their album ends up being too try-hard.

PUSHED BACK:
Leona Lewis- Glass Heart (underperforming lead single)
Cher- TBA (obviously not coming out in 2011 as intended)
Lionel Richie- Tuskegee (because he got sick; I'm only here for the Shania duet anyways)

Shania Twain- claims to be working on new material in 2007, doesn't release an album until 2012 at the earliest.

I've never had a fav push there album back...

.

Yeah, it sucks.

I've been waiting almost 6 years for No Doubt to put an album out. The whole entire time I've been a fan of them, they've only released one song, and it wasn't even a commercial single. But some people have been waiting almost 11 years now so ehh...

I hate push-backs just for the simple fact of it usually meaning an impending doom. There are a few exceptions -- Lil wayne, Drake, Kelly Clarkson -- who've released or are about to release push-backed albums with success, however most of the time it's needed to build more hype around the already stalling project.

So yes, I do care.

I don't like them at all, they make the wait worse. Most recently, Dev's new album has been pushed back to next year.

My fav doesn't do anything of tha sort