|
Celeb News: Pressed stunt double reaching for Queen Natalie
Banned
Member Since: 5/15/2010
Posts: 15,858
|
Pressed stunt double reaching for Queen Natalie
Quote:
The ballerina who served as a dancing double for Natalie Portman’s Oscar-winnning role in Black Swan tells EW she has been the victim of a “cover-up” to mislead the public about how much dancing Portman actually did in the film. “Of the full body shots, I would say 5 percent are Natalie,” says Sarah Lane, 27, an American Ballet Theatre soloist who performed many of the film’s complicated dance sequences, allowing Portman’s face to be digitally grafted onto her body. “All the other shots are me.”
Lane’s claim follows a March 23 L.A. Times article in which Portman’s fiancé and Black Swan choreographer Benjamin Millepied said Lane’s work in the film was far less significant. “There are articles now talking about her dance double [American Ballet Theatre dancer Sarah Lane] that are making it sound like [Lane] did a lot of the work, but really, she just did the footwork, and the fouettés, and one diagonal [phrase] in the studio,” he said. “Honestly, 85 percent of that movie is Natalie.”
Lane disagrees. “The shots that are just her face with arms, those shots are definitely Natalie,” she says. “But that doesn’t show the actual dancing.” Lane admits that she was never promised a particular title for her six weeks of work on the film, though she was disappointed to see that she is credited only as as “Hand Model,” “Stunt Double,” and “Lady in the Lane” (a brief walk-on role).
Lane also says that Black Swan producer Ari Handel specifically told her not to talk about her work to the press, even though she claims there was no such stipulation in her contract. “They wanted to create this idea in people’s minds that Natalie was some kind of prodigy or so gifted in dance and really worked so hard to make herself a ballerina in a year and a half for the movie, basically because of the Oscar,” says Lane. “It is demeaning to the profession and not just to me. I’ve been doing this for 22 years…. Can you become a concert pianist in a year and a half, even if you’re a movie star?”
Reps for Portman, Fox Searchlight, and Handel have yet to provide comments on the matter.
Lane is barely seen in promotional materials for the movie, including a VFX reel posted by studio Fox Searchlight that appears to show all the digital alterations made to key dance sequences. An unverified version of that reel, leaked to YouTube, seems to shows how digital face replacement was used to put Portman’s head on Lane’s body. (The clip was included in a blog post by Dance Magazine‘s Wendy Perron, who wrote about Lane’s story earlier this month.)
According to Lane, Portman’s dramatic transformation into a ballerina — a narrative firmly at the center of her successful Oscar campaign — wasn’t as impressive as the public was led to believe. “I mean, from a professional dancer’s standpoint, she doesn’t look like a professional ballet dancer at all and she can’t dance in pointe shoes. And she can’t move her body; she’s very stiff,” says Lane. “I do give her a lot of credit because in a year and a half she lost a lot of weight and she really tried to go method and get into a dancers head and really feel like a ballet dancer.”
In interviews, Portman didn’t hide the fact that she had used a body double for key sequences in the film, though Lane’s name, and the extent of her work, were played down. “I do have a double for the complicated turning stuff,” Portman told EW last November. “It was not anything I ever could have done in a year, nothing I could’ve caught up with. But I think it was just better for all of us if I did as much as possible.”
Lane insists she isn’t speaking out of jealousy over Portman’s acclaim. “[Natalie] is an amazing actress, for sure,” she says. “I know that it’s not a personal thing against me. I know that it’s just a political thing. It’s just unfortunate that I kind of lost credit.”
|
http://community.livejournal.com/ohn...age=1#comments
Now now now, b!tch, Natalie didn't win an oscar for dancing, she won for her acting... Stay pressed all your life!
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/16/2010
Posts: 69,775
|
She will stay mad at Natalie's critically-acclaimed, iconic performance. The box office, & corresponding paychecks for each girl, agree with me 
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 11/24/2009
Posts: 61,404
|
I believe it. There's a making-of online that shows much of the dancing is computer-generated. All those thrilling, climactic dance scenes are Portman's head CGI'd on top of a dancer's body.
All that "trained for a year" talk was good for generating Oscar buzz, though.
|
|
|
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 9/24/2009
Posts: 70,975
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/11/2008
Posts: 10,964
|
The title should be "Pressed stunt double goes IN on Queen Natalie", as the trends dictate.
I understand her, but she should be satisfied with the money she earned. 
Well, if she wasn't payed enough, then... 
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/22/2009
Posts: 50,646
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Haus_of_Nicole
I believe it. There's a making-of online that shows much of the dancing is computer-generated. All those thrilling, climactic dance scenes are Portman's head CGI'd on top of a dancer's body.
All that "trained for a year" talk was good for generating Oscar buzz, though.
|
Exactly, only on ATRL would people get angry at a woman for telling her side of a story.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 5/15/2010
Posts: 15,858
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Haus_of_Nicole
I believe it. There's a making-of online that shows much of the dancing is computer-generated. All those thrilling, climactic dance scenes are Portman's head CGI'd on top of a dancer's body.
All that "trained for a year" talk was good for generating Oscar buzz, though.
|
She probably trained for a year but it won't be enough to compete with a professional ballerina's skill. it still doesn't change the fact that they still need Natalie for the non-dancing scenes... 
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 11/24/2009
Posts: 61,404
|
Quote:
Originally posted by satellites™
Exactly, only on ATRL would people get angry at a woman for telling her side of a story.
|
I love the movie and the director got an amazing dramatic performance out of her, but physically, even the scene at the beginning of the movie where she's stretching in front of the mirror is CGI.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/17/2010
Posts: 21,708
|
Oooop.
Snatch Natalie and her GROSSLY overrated performance owt the game!
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2010
Posts: 37,025
|
This is only a problem for people who are fixated on gimmicks instead of acting, which doesn't even seem to include this dancer.
I'd probably not be too happy either if my contribution was made hush hush, though.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/17/2010
Posts: 12,926
|
I was watching the "Making Of" of the movie or whatever.
Im Happy it was nominated for Makeup, that **** was PURE CGI.
You wouldnt know it by watching the movie since Aronofsky did a brilliant job making it lok realistic, but the Body double stuff did take me aback a bit because there was buzz that she "trained" for a year to dance for the movie and Aronofsky never mentioned the fact of the extra once so I kind of get why shes mad.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/20/2010
Posts: 12,356
|
Did people really think Natalie performed those stunts by herself? 
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 11/24/2009
Posts: 61,404
|
Quote:
Originally posted by LightandDarkness
Did people really think Natalie performed those stunts by herself? 
|
No but I thought someone who trained for a year could at least stretch her legs without assist from computers.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2010
Posts: 37,025
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Haus_of_Nicole
No but I thought someone who trained for a year could at least stretch her legs without assist from computers.
|
Maybe she had zero natural flexibility. She always struck me as being pretty stiff. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/27/2009
Posts: 30,284
|
She's not reaching at all actually. The movie has garnered much praise and, as we all saw, Academy Awards so for her to be angry for the not receiving the praise she deserved is alright. Having said that, she shouldn't make it a big deal either especially If she was paid the correct amount for the time and effort.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 5/15/2010
Posts: 15,858
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Haus_of_Nicole
No but I thought someone who trained for a year could at least stretch her legs without assist from computers.
|
Well the point was to make her dancing a bit realistic instead of being awkward, right?
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 11/24/2009
Posts: 61,404
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrPeanut
Maybe she had zero natural flexibility. She always struck me as being pretty stiff. 
|
Which is fine, but much of her Oscar buzz/campaign was centered around the physical aspect of her performance - her training, her weight loss, her suffering that paralleled that of real-life ballerinas  . Very Harvey Weinstein of Searchlight. He sure taught everyone in town how to play dirty at awards time. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/6/2009
Posts: 7,375
|
What does she want though? Stunt doubles never get any recognition. That's what she signed up for. She should have kept her mouth shut and took one for the team.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/20/2010
Posts: 12,356
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hustle.
What does she want though? Stunt doubles never get any recognition. That's what she signed up for. She should have kept her mouth shut and took one for the team.
|
Same could be said about Ghost writers, who are hired by celebrities to write novels and just use the celebrity as the name to sell the brand.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2010
Posts: 37,025
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Haus_of_Nicole
Which is fine, but much of her Oscar buzz/campaign was centered around the physical aspect of her performance - her training, her weight loss, her suffering that paralleled that of real-life ballerinas  . Very Harvey Weinstein of Searchlight. He sure taught everyone in town how to play dirty at awards time. 
|
Everyone knows awards almost always come down to the narrative of the race, ******** or otherwise. 
|
|
|
|
|