What does the dominance of Adele and Beyoncé say about the industry?
EHRLICH: I want to take issue with the *question. I've been around long enough --
I helped kick-start that term "diva" in the early '90s, those VH1 shows. From that point on, we've had the Celines, Glorias, Faith Hills, Shanias, Mariahs, Whitneys. If we look back at our show year to year, there are probably a number of years where there were more female artists than males.
GERSON: I see it a little differently. The *difference this year, compared to others, is that Beyoncé and Adele are both women controlling their careers. In years past, the women who have been nominated *probably were A&R'd by men who told them what songs to sing, and men who wrote the songs for them and then asked them to go into the studio and kill it vocally. These two iconic superstars control their own destinies. They're not "divas." No offense; I think that was [the term] of the time. It's strange to me that VH1 still does it, because I don't know if that's how I would describe any woman. I wouldn't describe Beyoncé as a "diva." She is fierce, as is Adele.
KEITH: They're both bosses.
GERSON: Yes, bosses. That's how I see it.
KING: People want real. And there are a lot of women out there doing that.
http://www.billboard.com/articles/ne...able-interview
---------------------------------------
Is this the reason why 90's divas don't have that much Grammys compared to some of this generation's female singers?
Ironically this coment was made by a woman: Jody Gerson (Universal Music Publishing Group chairman/CEO)
Let's compare the grammy wins of 00's/10's divas with the 90's divas mentioned in this article:
Beyoncé: 20 Grammys
Adele: 10 Grammys
Taylor Swift: 10 Grammys
Compared to:
Whitney - 6
Mariah - 5
Celine - 5
Shania - 5
Faith Hill - 5
Gloria Estefan - 2