Quote:
Originally posted by fireaero
Can someone explain why a company would purposefully reshoot a film? Isn't that expensive and unnecessary?
|
Most big-budget movies have scheduled reshoots in the form of pick-ups (small, minor shots) or sometimes entire scenes. If a shoot goes well, reshoots are not necessary, but if something doesn't go as planned, you have a scheduled period where you can correct a mistake, shoot a scene again...
The trouble with Rogue One is that (allegedly, treat this as hear-say) the movie is so dark and dour in its tone that a lot of it will have to be rewritten (which is happening atm) and reshot, just to bring it closer to the rest of the Star Wars movies in tone. Another huge problem is the scheduling since you have to bring all the actors back, and if they are shooting a movie or a TV show, that can be a huge obstacle.
It's hard to know what to believe, but since Disney is throwing a bunch of money at this, I believe they'll salvage it. I know that Fantastic Four is a recent example of reshoots gone wrong, but not a lot of people know that the first Bourne Identity was an absolute disaster behind the scenes, and the reshoots actually improved what had been shot. World War Z is another somewhat positive example of reshoots - the director had only 60 minutes of usable footage after a lengthy and expensive shoot, so another writer was brought in to literally write the entire third act!
So we'll just have to wait and see now. I have faith in Disney, but it's still sad to hear that the movie didn't turn out well from the start.