Source is CNN.

Oop. Did he lie though?

Sanders is a sore loser.

He really isn't one to talk when he used his campaign contributions to fund a vacation to the Vatican and steal money from people once he effectively lost.

Sanders is calling out the obvious corruption by the Clintons.

At least he isn't funded by a dictatorship. Clinton seems to have a fascination with those.

Should have done it when he stood a chance of getting the nomination, then.

Bernie has integrity, like when he illegally used $500,000 of campaign funds to fund a holiday trip to Rome.

If foreign donations signal corruptions, then Sanders isn't one to talk. At least the Clinton's are legal.

http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2...ry-contributio

Also, the donations the Clintons have received have never affected their policy or voting record. The same can not be said of Sanders, who took money from the NRA and then voted in their interests.

Saudi Arabia is not a dictatorship, though.

And if you are coming for them since they are a religious state, then you have no point really when you approve the Vatican.

He's right though.

His comment is valid. She's actually more pro-war than most GOP, which is really sad. The Clinton Foundation is truly despicable.

Yes, that's the same as taking money from oppressive dictators...

i think it sa crime that sanders is till rummaging through the wallets of broke college students to fund his campaign

The reaching to excuse her actions. I understand supporting her but there are a lot of ****ed up things about her and her husband. And I mean A LOT.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...m-company.html

We know. Old news. News that also doesn't matter worth a **** given that countless people have explained in the news media lately that she separated her duties as SoS from the foundation completely and they offered specific examples that contradicted the lazy argument that this money influenced her.

No, there really aren't. Sorry!

The country is ruled under Sharia Law. Look up what the entails for its people.

And in that same article:

Maybe you should read it?

And my point is that Bernie isn't some high-handed, good guy. Clinton is irrelevant to my argument.