Source

Oops

Who would have guessed that??

Will the little monsters mock the source like they did with Vin's thread?

Maybe I should just delete that whole paragraph

cool

Eh, no reason to mock it. If there was an effort to do a follow up, an in fact to say the converse of what was originally said, then is there a reason to mock the source? Otherwise, for the source to be wrong after creating a second article about it would clearly mark them as putting their foot in their mouth.

Obviously the first time they posted this story, claiming there was a controversy, they were clearly just trying to stir the pot in the light of the album release.

As argued in the thread reporting this, this is all that mattered to me. Good promo, GaGa.

It's all subjective. Because a little monster posted it and the information is "positive," the source will not be mocked. But of course, for any other stanbase to post an article from the source, must most certainly be "shade," no? Information is information, regardless of who posts it. Some people -- most often, "pressed" members -- don't tend to grasp that concept.

poorly reviewed?

Y'all crazy.

The only source that said the sales would count has now retracted that statement.

Simple.

This is the only legitimate ammo they had against her for when the numbers are reported. It's understandable that they'd be upset.

I wouldn't say I was pressed by the other thread, really.

Nice gif though.
p.s. did you see Ke$ha's performance?


(To add, It's early, and I'm about to go to work, but anyhow. I didn't really think other people were making a gigantic deal out of everything until pages upon pages of the same argument being sent over and over. Anyway, tootles!! <3 <3 ).

Poorly reviewed? By Examiner?

You are so beyond pressed.