Question about the golden rule "guys should never hit girls"
So we all know the golden rule: "guys should never hit a girl". We all seen it on T.V: When a girl is screaming, bitching, cussing and fighting their boyfriend/guyfriends/etc, the guys will never hit back (and here's a video on why )
But my question is......... What about gay guys? Does this rule apply to gay guys?
Questions: Gay guys: If there was a girl fighting/hitting you in a club or wherever, would you fight back? Straight guys (if there's any ): Do you think gay guys should be allowed to fight back, or should they follow the golden rule?
I think the general consensus is that a male in general shouldn't beat up on a female because males tend to be stronger than females.
Yep, I agree. Gay or straight, at the end of the day, they are guys. But the thing is... After watching so much reality shows, it always boggles me when the females are screaming, bitching at the men, and they're standing there doing nothing, and the girl leaves with the "I win" attitude, like their mighty, etc.
Yep, I agree. Gay or straight, at the end of the day, they are guys. But the thing is... After watching so much reality shows, it always boggles me when the females are screaming, bitching at the men, and they're standing there doing nothing, and the girl leaves with the "I win" attitude, like their mighty, etc.
I honestly feel if a female puts her hands on you then you should hit her back (altho beating her is another thing).
I've seen men who just go get another female to beat the girl up instead of doing it himself, but that's scummy to me.
But, the men are right in the case, the the bitch walk away, a few words isn't worth getting in trouble over.
How did I know this was going to lead to a question about gay men even before I opened a thread.
Gay men are still men. What does their sexuality have to do with anything? A man hitting a woman for some reason, just doesn't look right. Women are considered to the delicate species. But I mean, if a girl was literally attacking you and injuring you to the point where you couldn't restrain her, than obviously I think it makes sense to hit back.
What I don't get is why do so many feminists bitch and whine about how women are equal to men on all accounts, and should be treated equally, yet they believe that men should never hit women regardless of how they size up because "it's not fair". The same feminists have NO PROBLEM with a man beating up on a smaller, weaker guy. What is the difference? That rule basically implies that women are inherently inferior to men and thus, not equal. That's why all feminists are automatically stupid - their premise isn't even logical.
I'm not really a violent person, but honestly if I feel threatened I am defending myself. I don't think I'd ever beat up on anyone...but like I said I am going to defend myself the best way I see fit. You have the balls to hit me surely you can deal with the consequences.
What I don't get is why do so many feminists bitch and whine about how women are equal to men on all accounts, and should be treated equally, yet they believe that men should never hit women regardless of how they size up because "it's not fair". The same feminists have NO PROBLEM with a man beating up on a smaller, weaker guy. What is the difference? That rule basically implies that women are inherently inferior to men and thus, not equal. That's why all feminists are automatically stupid - their premise isn't even logical.
I thought that so many times, but I ended up always we the same result: it's worthless. Those feminazis will always try to make themselves the wisers.
It ended with the teacher breaking it up. She had hit me first. I have less self control over my actions when I don't know a person as well so I hit her back.
I was a measly 115 pounds then. She was...more. I saw nothing unfair or inappropriate about it. I feel as if a girl has the balls to put her hands on me, she has the balls to take a hit.