Yes, unlike Pink, you can see lots of teen that dress like her, rock her hair styles etc. Also her music is more popular, too. But you knew people would drag her to the bits here and still MADE this thread.
Being culturally relevant and having a place in the industry are two different things.
She is not culturally relevant. Very few artists are. And this isn't anything against her, it's just that she focuses mostly on music. She doesn't go out of her way or try to be anything else.
And yes, she has a place in the industry. She has set the standard for yearly releases and is a known chart killer.
She can't sustain proper relevance after her singles drop out of the top 40 on iTunes and radio. Outside of her singles, she's non-existent. And her albums have always been non-events, so aside from domestic violence issues, she herself has nothing to offer to the public that will make them interested in her as an artist and a person.
Yes, unlike Pink, you can see lots of teen that dress like her, rock her hair styles etc. Also her music is more popular, too. But you knew people would drag her to the bits here and still MADE this thread.
I can't control what people do I made this thread because I honestly wanted to know if people thought my fave was culturally relevant. Get a ****ing grip.
Yes, unlike Pink, you can see lots of teen that dress like her, rock her hair styles etc. Also her music is more popular, too. But you knew people would drag her to the bits here and still MADE this thread.
Her music is more popular, yet she doesn't sell as much albums as Pink? Makes perfect sense.
