In your opinion, which video cost more to make and why?

Judas

ET. Judas is just costumes nothing else.

Something based on statistical figures isn't a topic that can be debated about

But I think E.T. is the one. All the visual effects would've cost a bomb.

Judas I think

Judas. But E.T. video is better.

E.T is mostly computerized right? If so I think that would be kinda expensive, so I'll go with E.T.

Judas.

Flooding that sound stage couldn't have been cheap.

Judas

I don't know actually

Those special effects for E.T. I think have an high price, Judas has a whole Universal set rented for it with that waterfall machine and then the motorbikes' scene on the highway. We really can't know

I remember there were rumors that Judas cost 10 million to make

Judas

Yeah, that's actually the reason I'm asking this.

judas more expensive,but E.T more better video

LOL BYE.
E.T. Obviously.
Riding down the highway on motorcycles.....

Pick the logical one.

i see hates on the younger lady

Maybe et. Perry should get a refund. The special effect were cheapy and ******

ET would have had expensive post-production thanks to the special effects, but Judas has multiple large-scale set ups, location filming on a motorway and a scene with a simulated wave which will have added up to a pretty big budget.

Hard to judge.

Judas actually had a huge set, didn't it? You could do the ET video with a green screen, costumes, make-up etc but I guess the SFX could be expensive. Probably not as expensive as the actual props in Judas though.

E.T looks more expensive.