|
Celeb News: Jay Z: "Music became free, but people will pay 6$ for water"
Member Since: 10/7/2010
Posts: 17,418
|
Jay Z: "Music became free, but people will pay 6$ for water"
Quote:
Billboard: When did it first occur to you to get into the streaming business?
Jay Z: A year-and-a-half ago. We saw the movement and how everything was going and figured that this could possibly be the last music format that we see in this lifetime. We didn’t like the direction music was going and thought maybe we could get in and strike an honest blow and if, you know, the very least we did was make people wake up and try to improve the free vs. paid system, and promote fair trade, then it would be a win for us anyway.
Musicians have long complained that streaming has rendered music virtually worthless. It doesn’t sound like you’re solely driven by financial reasons, but also by a desire to reset the value proposition of music.
That’s correct, absolutely, and when I spoke to every single person involved that’s what I said. Music is … imagine your life without music. It’s a very valuable part of your life, and like I said, that’s why we got in this business. It seems to be going the other way. People are not respecting the music, and [are] devaluing it and devaluing what it really means. People really feel like music is free, but will pay $6 for water. You can drink water free out of the tap, and it’s good water. But they’re OK paying for it. It’s just the mind-set right now.
In some ways music is probably closer to priceless than worthless.
Yes. The experiences that I’ve had growing up with music, you know, I couldn’t trade them for any money in the world. Dancing in the living room to enjoy myself. “Enjoy Yourself,” Michael Jackson. Those moments and just that feeling of joy, it’s priceless, like you said.
Isn’t another of your goals to make sure the revenue makes its way down the food chain to content creators?
Definitely. For someone like me, I can go on tour. But what about the people working on the record, the content creators and not just the artists? If they’re not being compensated properly, then I think we’ll lose some writers and producers and people like that who depend on fair trade. Some would probably have to take another job, and I think we’ll lose some great writers in the process. Is it fair? No. If you put in work, everyone else, you go to work you get paid. That’s fair trade. It’s what our country is built on.
So, Tidal launches today. Creatively, what do you hope happens, beginning tomorrow?
Artists come here and start making songs 18 minutes long, or whatever. I know this is going to sound crazy, but maybe they start attempting to make a “Like a Rolling Stone,” you know, a song that doesn’t have a recognizable hook, but is still considered one of the greatest songs of all time, the freedom that this platform will allow art to flourish here. And we’re encouraging people to put it in any format they like. It doesn't have to be three minutes and 30 seconds. What if it’s a minute and 17, what if it’s 11; you know, just break format. What if it’s just four minutes of just music and then you start rapping?
Twelve months from now, what would be your definition of success with Tidal? It doesn’t sound like it’s a financial benchmark.
If everyone says, “Wow, so many things have changed. This has gotten better. I like what's happening.” If Aloe Blacc and his writers, the guys he wrote with, are not seeing a $4,000 check from 168 million streams.
They did their job, they worked, they done it. The people loved it, the people consumed it. Where’d it go? People didn’t pay or stream Aloe Blacc’s music for it to turn into vapor and go into the air. Where is it?
If in 12 months everyone is having that discussion and a dialogue, and everyone is understanding that streaming’s not a bad thing, I’m happy. Let’s embrace what’s coming up next.
|
Source: Complete interview here
http://www.billboard.com/articles/ne...vine-interview
I'm not a big fan of how they handled the communication around this so far, especially that livestream treaty, SO messy.
But i always believed streaming was the future of music and Jay convinced me here, i love music, it brings joy and inspiration like nothing else and i love buying my music to help all the people who made it. That's fair trade.
Just like how my mom used to buy all her music in the 90s and made me fall in love with music.
I'm gonna leave Spotify and subscribe to Tidal because i can afford it. (and i also understand people who can't afford music, that's why alternatives exists)
And i really want all the artists i love to rely more on music from now on and stop relying so much on touring.
Because new talented producers and writers get nothing from touring, and become less inclined to be discovered and help our favorite artists to do quality music.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/7/2010
Posts: 26,813
|
I mean, sorry Shawn, you already have lots of money.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/18/2011
Posts: 30,431
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/23/2012
Posts: 20,204
|
***** you already got money and people NEED water they don't NEED music like wtf.
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/23/2012
Posts: 20,204
|
How can people who are already rich be so money hungry?
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/12/2011
Posts: 4,250
|
I think I still prefer water .... sorry Jay !
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/11/2010
Posts: 11,240
|
I can't see these people the same way again they are so out of touch.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/25/2010
Posts: 18,931
|
This really says more about him being so disconnected from everyone else and paying $6 for water. Like, does he live in an amusement park?
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 9,392
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/7/2011
Posts: 41,996
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ryanpittman97
How can people who are already rich be so money hungry?
|
Lol um who cares? If this is becomes successful, it will benefit the new artists.
Sure they are being greedy but look at the other side which is important too
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 42,704
|
He's comparing water to music?
And $6 for water?
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/23/2012
Posts: 20,204
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Starstruck.
Lol um who cares? If this is becomes successful, it will benefit the new artists.
Sure they are being greedy but look at the other side which is important too
|
I already pay 9.99 for Spotify
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 8/17/2013
Posts: 11,649
|
I'll use Tidal. I don't mind the cost, and it has all the artists and music I'm interested in so far.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/29/2010
Posts: 29,249
|
This "already rich" argument is so damn dumb. Arent the owners of "Spotify already rich... Umm, I wonder if Mark Zuckerberg comes out with a streaming service, we will hear, "oh, but he's already rich. A black man does it and he's money hungry. BS.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/19/2012
Posts: 25,222
|
Quote:
You can drink water free out of the tap, and it’s good water. But they’re OK paying for it. It’s just the mind-set right now.
|
He didn't rly think this quote through.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/27/2012
Posts: 3,597
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 42,704
|
Quote:
Originally posted by conseeded
He didn't rly think this quote through.
|
!
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/4/2010
Posts: 34,287
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Cheers
What water costs $6?
|
In another thread someone said Jay-Z has no idea how much things cost and this really solidifies it
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/4/2014
Posts: 13,522
|
Didnt he buy one million copies of his last album and gave it for free dddd .
Oh the money...
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 4/4/2014
Posts: 2,554
|
He's delusional if he thinks everyone is paying $6 for water
|
|
|
|
|