Interstellar, the Oscar-tipped latest offering from Christopher Nolan, looks set to be the British film-maker’s longest movie yet, with a running time of almost three hours.
A listing on a cinema website in Australia, where the much-hyped science fiction epic is due to open on 6 November, suggests the film will run for 175 minutes. That would make it a full 10 minutes longer than the final instalment in Nolan’s Batman trilogy, The Dark Knight Rises, which ran to 165 minutes in 2012 and was up until now the director’s longest film.
Well Scarface was 170 minutes long and I got through that as well as The Dark Knight Rises so I'll be fine, is this movie gonna be entirely set on
that ice planet?
All of the "Interstellar" trailers look boring, so I can't imagine sitting through
three long hours of a boring film. I'm getting "The Tree of Life" flashbacks. Pass.
All of the "Interstellar" trailers look boring, so I can't imagine sitting through
three long hours of a boring film. I'm getting "The Tree of Life" flashbacks. Pass.
All of the "Interstellar" trailers look boring, so I can't imagine sitting through
three long hours of a boring film. I'm getting "The Tree of Life" flashbacks. Pass.
But I'm actually glad they do breaks here, I don't think, with drinks and all, my bladder couldn't handle three hours.
I'm surprised I was able to watch The Wolf of Wall Street (5 mins longer than this) without going to the restroom. And I was in VIP so the free drinks didn't help too