All debut in the late 90's, all were huge stars yet Beyoncé and P!nk are the only ones currently relevant today and are the only ones capable of moving albums and touring the globe.
Why is this?

Full package , they can sing, dance, just all around great performers , & both stay out headlines.

I guess talent always wins.

Is this the question that keeps you up all night?

Did I miss something?

Ya'll sure do talk about Britney a lot. For someone who's career has been "dead since 2011" she sure stays on your minds.

i mean...i think it's fairly obvious that britney's health and personal life had played a part.
xtina switched genres after every album which may have put off casual fans?
jlo is like 10 years older than all of them so probably ageism


but, britney's residency is huge, xtina makes millions sitting on a chair, and jlo is always going to be A-list

idk if you can count Britney out yet...yeah she had ONE flop era - but P!nk had them in her first years & Brit is just having hers now. Also who says Britney can't tour? Her last tour, while not as successful as Beyonce or Pink still went RIGHT ROUND the globe an grossed over 70 million.

Not to mention she has a very successful residency where people from around the globe travel to her - it's a very lucrative deal for her so why would she change it?

Well, they are just better. Not much else to say.

Britney isn't going on WW tours because of her kids. She has said many times that she wants to be able to go to her kids soccer games and be there for parent-teacher conferences which is why she wanted to do Vegas. She doesn't want to drag her kids around the world for concerts. I can't at people thinking she can't tour. She just doesn't want to tour at the moment because of her kids.

Britney has only had 1 flop era.... I don't understand these threads.Pink was flopping when Britney was at her peak.

Britney still got people making threads just to hate on her?

Her staying power.

Also was J-lo ever really there aside from a few hits? Her consistent presence is not due to her music career...

Britney had one genuine flop of an album and that means P!nk has ran past her? Britney is making heaps of cash filling seats in Vegas where people have to actually travel to her and spend even more on hotel rooms on top of drinks on top of her ticket prices. And thats amidst and after her worst record to date. I mean....they wouldnt do that for P!nk. I get that shes making her money as well and she clearly has a following of sorts, but ATRL does too much with P!nk lately. Shes not relevant in the same way that Britney is. Britney is always relevant.

Grammy winning Say Something was bigger than anything Bey, and Pink released this decade. Talent won. X started before those 2, and outlasted them.

+Beyoncé seems like a very driven, smart, calculated and focused individual. She cannot fail.
+Pink was always ageless, cool/boyish and her chorus are fire.
Britney's days were counted from the start.. Her cuteness was okay until a certain point, you can not keep that bubble gum vibe and voice going once you go past 25yrs. To bad her team didn't understand that, she should have change her style by her 3rd album.
+JLo was/is a sexy Latina with a few hits, but she's aging, I personally think she did better than most in keeping a positive image in the GP eyes.

This is a good question!

it's like...so simple yet they can't ever figure it out.

It's laughable that a feature is the only thing you can cling to. So Christina debut before 1997
How did she outlast Bey and P!nk? Enlighten me?

Also BEYONCE and The Truth About Love destroyed Christina's last two studio albums put together.

Well obviously. She married her business partner and used their relationship against him.