High school senior and Sean Cody model “Noel” has allegedly been suspended and will not graduate this year after several of his bareback flicks found their way onto the principal’s desk.
The poster on Reddit who identifies himself as the cousin of Noel’s classmate, claims the budding gay **** model has been “severely bullied” since fellow classmates discovered his side job and instead of helping, school administrators have suspended him for 10 days for “causing a campus disturbance.”
His suspension will allegedly lead to “an automatic failure from absences,” and he will not be able to graduate come June.
The post continues:
Quote:
Several students planned to protest by wearing support shirts, making posters, and skipping a class. The principle [sic] is threatening to automatically expel any student who joins in.
Uh, where’s the ACLU in all of this? An of-age gay **** model partakes in a completely legal activity off school grounds, and the school decides it has the authority to ruin his life? Sorry, Mr. Principal, that’s not how life works.
|
Or, as the top-rated commenter puts it:
Quote:
A public high school is required to accept all students within its attendance boundaries and while it can suspend or expel students for disciplinary problems, it cannot punish students for lawful activities. For example, high schools cannot punish students for drinking or smoking in property not owned by the school district provided the students are abiding by federal, state, and local law as well as any lawful restrictions imposed by the property owner.
From what it sounds like, the school is punishing “Noel” for participating in a lawful activity which some of the students, faculty, and staff don’t believe he should legally be allowed to do. The latter isn’t “Noel”‘s problem and it’s the [public] school’s job to make sure that he is not harassed during the time he is on school property or participating in school sponsored activities.
Assuming this is a public school, the ACLU will likely want to get involved and the school could possibly be sued for violating the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. As there is no requirement that one be gay/bi to work in gay ****, any lack of a nondiscrimination policy concerning sexual orientation should not be an issue.
|
Source