Are the standards for warnings too sensitive and expansive?


I even received a "nickname" warning and 1 point for accidentally typing an "e" in Nicki's name...


EDIT: I'll probably get warned for this poll.

I love the nicknames warning. It's something unique to us and makes us 100000X classier than those other places.

Yes.

Sometimes yes, sometimes no. I think shading shouldn't be warned unless it's really bad.
Other than that, it could be stricter on people who constantly troll (and also make pointless threads)

Of course.

Easy to say for a moderator.

mess

Wait a minute. You've only gotten warned for nicknames twice, and the names were Ci-error and X-factorney. What are you trying to do?

Yes, I got 2 "trolling" points for saying I didn't like a cover somebody did.

Yes.

Yes.
I have 7 undeserved points.

How was I supposed to know I'm not allowed to ask people to piss on me?

I think nicknames rule is good... frankly I don't wanna see stans throwing around terms like "Legentina", "Goddonna", "Queenga" etc.

Reports for gif only posts are useless
SOmetimes a gif says more than a post

Says the moderator.

Yeah I just got a one for calling gaga Brunettega.

I mean really if you don't like it just ignore it and stop being so damn petty... (this is to the person who so boldly reported me lol)

Yes to the 10th power You can barley tell a joke with out getting warned. Like if you crack a joke about some one flopping like how does that hurt anyone it''s just a silly joke.

I've never used them before I became a mod, or on my other pop site where they're allowed. I don't like them.

And that category is gone. Did you not read the new rules.
Now there's "Disruptive" category in its place.