Quote:
Originally posted by Icannot
Sis if they were, then they would have reviewed Taylor's material. Do you mean against?

|
Yes.

But they keep mentioning Taylor randomly at their reviews. I will just wait for the time they give her a review. A good one. 8.0 min.
If they're able to give Paul McCartney's awful RAM a 9.2, why not with Taylor?
Quote:
Originally posted by CountryFriedChick
Sorry sis
and I didn't know Pitchfork was biased against country music I don't blame them especially with some of the acts in country who garner respect so yeah it is impressive that YBWM made the list especially being #69 and not toward the bottom.
Yep Atrl underrates Taylor and I wouldn't have it any other way. I'd probably be more worried if she was treated as some kind of star here especially with the artists that everyone seems to stan for 
|
All is good sis.
It is impressive. Even tho they used "twee indie pop" there. But they still count her as an Indie. The Indie Bible has spoken.
And I prefer to have level-headed ones to stan for Taylor instead of cutter teens.
--
At others, stop trying with the stupid drags at that Undeserved Grammy AOTY thread. It's corny and horrid at the same time. Let the thread die, please.
