What a terrible cideo

No offense, but you clearly haven't read my post.

I said that SJWs believe saying "All white people must die" is not racist. That's a fact. Ask them yourselves. They say it's not racism, only "prejudice". Therefore, when they say this video isn't racist, it's meaningless. They're not saying the video isn't discriminatory, they're just saying the targets are white so it doesn't matter.

It's a messed up and evil ideology.

Nobody in the video said all white people must die, but even if someone did SJWs would still be saying it's not racist. It doesn't fit their definition of racism.

Feminists do the same. It's happened numerous times in feminist literature for them to say things like "All men must die". They believe it's OK because they think men are oppressors and can't be victims of sexism.

I'm sorry everybody, but as a society we can't have meaningful discussions about racism if a vocal minority of people are using a completely different definition of the word.

It's like if you're trying to discuss the economy of "America" and one person is talking about the US and the other person thinks they're talking about the entire American continent. There'll be loads of confusion and both sides won't understand what the other side is going on about. This is what happens when we discuss "racist" now. One side thinks we're talking about "Someone who discriminates against others because of race", but the other side is saying "racist = white people".

SJWs probably thought they could push for a different definition of the word and in 10 years time everybody else will end up using that definition. Sorry, but it's not happening. People are aware of what SJWs are trying to do and nobody will change to their definition of racism.

Yeah it's really just arguing semantics for no real good reason. Whether you consider it "racist" or not, it's still horrible to discriminate/judge someone based on their race.

Well...they didn't lie!

This is just the hyperbole of the Internet and I think the response
is a culmination of feelings over recent months/years. I'm sure 90% of the people you're referring to have spent a fair portion of their time in real life & on social media dragging Trump and co-signing criticism of the right and have barely spoke on stuff like this.

But most people also operate in echochambers, whether it their friends, family or social media bubble. When a certain sentiment is the status quo, the value of reiterating it becomes dimished.

Trump is not a divisive issue if you are liberal, whether moderate or far left. Things like this however are supported by a fair portion left whilst also discouraged by another portion, when you disagree with a respected peer that brings forth more conversation, internal debate and frustrations. It's why most Atrl members spend more time talking about white gays than legitimate hate groups.

But as you said, if it's not productive I think it's hugely important for it to be challenged, especially by those who can actually influence the direction (other liberals). For me it's just so frustrating thst genuinely intelligent liberals are more concerned with their their ego than they are with effectively communicating their message and enabling the change they want to see.

No amount of intellectual debate is going to change the average white males response to being negatively generalised, spoken down to, being told their privilege makes this cool and then being told their "white tears" are delicious I just really want this discussion to be moved forward half a step. The demographic won over by sassy, click bait is ours. New tactics now.

racism againt white people does not aexist when will yall learn.
a for the video, it's a damn mess.

MTV is so extra.

Are people saying that white people can't experience racism talking about America only or...? Do you guys think a white person can experience racism in a country where white people are not a majority like Kenya or Nepal for example?

Racist or not, this video is embarrassing.

it's true. a white student brought our dark skinned French professor a bucket of banana's in front of the entire class at UhCL because she got a C and the rest of the white kids in the class were defending her. They nicknamed him donkey kong after, SICK.
(I'm not saying he didn't overly enjoy the bananas a little TOO much, but still)

MTV has been so messy ever since they stopped showing music videos. Do people even watch MTV anymore?

then what the hell are you rambling about if what you're saying has nothing to do with the video and just an attempt to keep crying about sjw, which is all you do.

the answer was in the quote you just replied to

"but even if someone did SJWs would still be saying it's not racist. It doesn't fit their definition of racism."

I don't care what word you call it, racism or prejudice. Both are messed up and absolutely uncalled for.

Again, I ask:

Where in the video did any white person get judged for being white? Where is the anti-white discrimination? By pointing out how white people are complacent to discrimination through their positions in society?

This is the issue in ideology that arises.

Of course it's AWFUL to discriminate against anyone for their race, no matter what race it is; HOWEVER, what some people consider racism or discrimination is.....sad. The same posters who say that black men murdered in cold blood by awful police officers is just liberal propaganda are the ones who claim asking white people to check their white privilege is "anti-white racism", like what??

Telling people to check how they're complacent to institutional racism is NOT an act of racism in itself, like WTF.

MTV has fallen so much They used to be a bastion for open-minded, actually liberal thought in the entertainment world.

And just in terms of production value too, this is painfully unfunny and horribly scripted.

Again, what is even the point of bringing that up.. "but even if..." - who gives a crap it wasn't said in the video. It's off topic.

The video didn't lie tho

How can you come for me for "not reading your post" when you literally just replied to the first sentence of mine? I really can't.

If you operate under the definition that racism also involves power then it's not racist. Outside of that it's just an argument of semantics, as you said, that I don't like to entertain.

My point is that this basically harmless video was made and this is immediately what you go to, these "SJWs" saying all white people must die. Basically you got triggered lmao. Less than positive things about white people were said and now you feel very victimized. I don't mean to be rude but news flash, that's what PoC are going through all the time.

(Honestly I hate even deigning to arguments in which the term "SJW" is used. I'm sure you too hate discussions where people just throw around "bigots do this" and "racists do that" without any further look at the problem and referring to "SJWs" is the exact same thing. You're just dismissing what they're saying and not actually listening. Just labeling people with these big umbrella terms ends conversation.)

lskdafalkjsd this is the clock I wish I had thought of.