Seeing as how you STAY posted in this thread, digging it back up a day later when you literally said you were done messing around in here, responding back to my post, not even 30 seconds afterwards, yet you are the one calling people desperate. Try harder
I never said I was done
I said goodnight last night because I was literally going to bed
It's fun getting you guys mad. I have some good friends in some swifties but theres a good chunk of you that get so overprotective and defensive its insane
Yet, 1989 is not generic, a few generic songs does not equate to a whole album or artist being generic. Like, where the **** is the logic in that?! Taylor Swift is NOT a generic bubble gum pop artist either .While Katy is the epitome of bubblegum generic pop music, it's hard for anybody to deny that.
WTF? Taylor literally makes the EXACT same kind of music as Katy though. You're telling me Unconditionally is bubble gum pop but Shake It Off isn't?
That isn't an indicator of good writing skills. Taylor is the better songwriter. Songs like Dear John, All Too Well and more on her entire discography prove it. That doesn't mean Katy is bad at it, but unlike Swift, Perry needs like 5 co-writers to finish her songs or what her team brings to her. Didn't Teenage Dream come from Bonnie McKee's thoughts?
Nope! All written by Katy alone. That's not to mention the other dozens of songs written by Katy and just one or two other people.
WTF? Taylor literally makes the EXACT same kind of music as Katy though. You're telling me Unconditionally is bubble gum pop but Shake It Off isn't?
Is Taylor Swift defined by generic bubblegum pop music the way Katy is?? Uh, no. I never said Taylor didn't make generic fluff occasionally (and it has been upon very few occasions). While dipping into the genre a few times, she is not primarily a bubblegum artist like Perry.