The accuracy

In the same week. #NoBasicZone

30 years later still on the cover #NoBasicAllowed

such a vile human ugh

OMG what are these full-page ads?

Oh we are still talking about madonna.

Remember when Vanessa popped in for 2 minutes at the end of Atonement and completely stole the film?

wtf this is kind of weird.







No solo cover but they span over three decades (90s, 2000s, 2010s)?

Yeah, I don't see how Beyonce posing in underwear is anti-feminist. Her body looks great in that pic and the underwear/transparent summer dress thing looks nice. It's not like she's presenting herself to the camera in a degrading way.

If anything, the argument against the authenticity of her feminism lies in the fact that she let Jay make that "eat the cake, Anna Mae!" pun on her album.

In what world? Keira's green dress alone is iconic.

It annoys me when whenever a woman needs to be powerful or a "boss", the go-to look is no pants and cleavage.

She didn't dress appropriately for that cover. I don't see men showing up in underwear for their TIME covers. She was ranked on TIME's most influential people list for being a smart and strong businesswoman and a leading figure in the music industry. Posing in underwear on an occasion like that pulls focus from the reason she was ranked on the list to her body. Exposing her body at times when it's not necessary is not feminist nor is it fierce. It's forced and implies that she has The I Can't Keep Clothes On In Occasions Where I'm Not Asked To Take Them Off Syndrome.

Romola was kinda underrated as far as the Brionys went, I felt.

But popstars like her are mainly about beauty and shape

24 hours

She's a pop star/icon, it's completely appropriate for her to wear something that isn't business-casual for a TIME Magazine cover, especially considering her entire album's theme is sexual feminism.