No, thank YOU for providing me with the perfect example for my argument

See mods that's what I mean. I find that ^^^ kind of ridiculous and just plain mean.

Can I open a new base for Jason Mraz because it has expired and member that owns it is banned? The old one: http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=173010

When will we get the Warnings & Reports tea for June?

I didn't warn you but even if you had the link, I'm pretty sureyou would have still been warned for file sharing. 2 points either way.

If they're at 9 points, then there's a good chance that they are already aware of the rules, at least most of them, so sending a reminder and telling them not to commit an offense they may have done in the past is quite pointless.

Why is Dhipita banned?

Yes, we see how many active points while at the warning screen.

If you are @ 9 points and you knowing break the rules, you should be banned. A point is a point, no matter if you have 0 or 19.

I asked in the warnings and reports thread, but I don't know if that's he right place...I couldn't find my name anywhere even though I've gotten warning points this month, so does that mean that a mod warned my post before it was reported?

It would indeed seem weird to exclude points from the messy members with reminders while they should deserve points and a month outside, just because you know they are at 9. Or 19.

Yes, your vulgar WP was warned without being reported.

It could also mean that they were warned by different moderators so not the same, as that is not posted because it would become to big. You see they cut off below the Moderator / Member / Points at lowest being 2.
Also they were reported by different members than. It also cuts off at 2.

That makes sense now. I couldn't imagine a regular ATRLer reporting that. Thank you both!

Yeah but I've got a warning point in my bin right now for saying "Let me not. I don't need to points." for being off-topic when I see it written over ATRL all the time and I've never seen it warned/reported. I was simply withholding my opinion because I didn't want to offend anyone, but I wanted to be like "I'm thinking something but I'm not going to say it " - and like I said, people do it on here all the time.

Another time I got a point for disruptive for posting this gif:



When the only reason I had this gif was because multiple people were commenting it after my essays, and they never got warned.

My point is, people can be 100% aware of the rules, and think that they're following them, and are being good members contributing to interesting conversations and yet they still get warned because some rules seem to be so exploitable or even made up on the spot.

Like MCMXCVIl just showed, he got punched out for saying "hey I really like your signature " Is that behaviour really so horrible or detrimental to the site that it warrants excluding someone from joining in for 30 days? Or even giving them a single point? It's not like he was going "LOL KATY PERRY CAN'T SING LIVE LOL LADY GAGA IS FAT AND FLOPPING LOL RIHANNA GOT BEAT UP."

I've read the rules multiple times so I can be sure to avoid getting points and every time I get points I'm like:

No, this has definitely been warned multiple times in the past.