Quote:
Originally posted by wanderlust
how did this even get warned? it's one of the few articulate and intelligent posts in this topic. the twitter account was filled with monster retweets. this topic is filled with picture edits of katy suggesting payola.
exactly.
|
i can't when people find the anti-gaga anti-gaga fan post and call it articulate and intelligent solely because its slandering both her and her fanbase.
that is so transparent.
the only reason this event and its consequential reactions matter is because it exposes the hypocrisy exhibited by you and the media. had this been tweeted about gaga rather than katy perry you would (a) defend the tweets, the legitimacy of the radio station, and the legitimacy of the "tweeter" (b) call lady gaga desperate or some variation of that term (c) slander and belittle anyone that objected to the tweets or your statements as delusional.
but since this is about katy perry in regards to gaga, this guy is possibly getting fired and everyone here is quick to come to her defense. had this been about gaga there would've been at least 3 articles online right now stretching the subject of her careers supposed demise even thinner.
its just exhausting.
and in regards to the whole payola thing, im sure many artists do it. im pretty sure what this dude would've been getting at is that she paid some serious cash to get her **** in the highest rotation possible. I mean if you're all so quick to assume that in fact all pop stars do it, then why would it be so absurd that some are more hardcore about it then others? and if so what does it say about how well theyd do without it if they choose to go that hard in the first place? at the end of the day shes the one that ultimately gets the most radio spins resulting in the most attention and the most sales so thats all that will matter.