It was an ok game, didn't quite have the same all encompassing story that Asylum and City have. But for another studio they didn't mess it up too badly. Only concern is the ludicrous amount of glitches and game freezes that occur.
It was an ok game, didn't quite have the same all encompassing story that Asylum and City have. But for another studio they didn't mess it up too badly. Only concern is the ludicrous amount of glitches and game freezes that occur.
Same, it didn't SLAY me like City, but it was cute. Seemed like a filler sequel/prequel tbh. I haven't gotten any glitches yet, but the twist disappointed me, it feels like the developers were too afraid to take a risk with the storyline and truly put the spotlight on a lesser-known villain.
I like the game but it has no reason to be created, i never wondered what are the origins of Arkham, i wanted to see a progressive game with add ons not left over the only adds i loved are the detective mode thats it, the city is dead and lifeless.
Just played the first hour. Its good, but i haven't felt anything that separates it from City yet. I mean you felt the difference between Asylum and City almost immediately... I'm all for the "if its not broke don't fix it" so I don't really care if it does end up being City 2.0, i loved that game.
