It should do. They count two reviews if two are given.

One from the independent, one from the independent on Sunday. They are technically different publications. Its just not clear from the website.

See:
Talk That Talk http://www.metacritic.com/music/talk...critic-reviews

Two 40s are counted.

Yes it does There is very little ambiguity in that one.

Its from the Observer.

Oh I see.

It does count I think. They counted the two different ones for Robin Thicke (a better example than the other already listed in this thread since the two 'separate publications' actually gave a different score). http://www.metacritic.com/music/blur...critic-reviews

Not a big deal.

I don't get it, why are people so shocked/laughing at those 4 scores? You all know that Katys highest score prior to Prism is 52/100, right? Those 40s aren't shocking in the slightest.

As long as her score remains above 52 (and in the Green) then Prism has been critically a success by Katys standards.

No, because the review is genuinely an amateur mess. Prism is OK but let's not get ahead of ourselves, that reviewer isn't even a real person, it's another of Jemuel DaSilva's various identities.

The review is full of mistakes and digs at Gaga, and the reviewer's other articles highlight an obvious bias.

I don't even try to understand some people anymore.

Can you substantiate that argument? It might be something I would be willing to hear provided it's true. If not, don't say it.

Billboard betta hurry with their score

Yer. Expecting an 85+ from BB. She runs that joint

It really doesn't matter why score they give her. For some reason I get the feeling that we will be seeing you back in here regardless.

well, he's made various fake accounts on twitter before - claiming to be gaga fans but being recently created and not even following her.

The writer of this review:
https://twitter.com/AngelaCheng91/following - Jem DaSilva, Perez Hilton

Then, another anti-Gaga writer with a similar style:

http://www.examiner.com/article/lady...ong-with-thong

http://www.examiner.com/pop-music-in...brina-o-connor

http://www.examiner.com/list/lady-ga...the-millennium

http://www.examiner.com/review/madon...ng-work-of-art

Then her twitter:

Similar bio "I love Pop music!"

https://twitter.com/SabrinaOConnor9/following - also following Perez

The people following her https://twitter.com/SabrinaOConnor9/followers - "Jem DaSilva"

I can't believe I just wrote all this out but you asked for evidence

I don't dislike Katy I just don't think Prism's that great and examiner.com is the pits

These Gaga fans PERCHED in here...



Why so obsessed with Prism's metacritic score if Katy Perry is not a threat at all?

Personally I really hope that Prism will get a 60+ because the album is good and it deserves a good score.

And yes I'm a Gaga stan

I'm not seeing enough to justify that accusation. Some writers were critical about Lady Gaga and then someone gave Katy's album a good review. The fact that you're inventing conspiracy theories to avoid the reality of the situation is kind of concerning, to be honest.

Have you read their other articles? The obsession is real

They're only praising Prism because it's Gaga's competition, surely that's an insult to the Kats?

I don't understand this fanbase sometimes tbh



and also if you know spanish http://www.taringa.net/comunidades/f...cias-21-1.html

The obsession is definitely real... (not in the way you think, though)

So you're implying that he's genuinely a Katy fan? Okay then

No, I was implying that you're the one who is obsessed. Your posts in this thread alone are proof of that.

Did I lie tho

Someone asked for evidence, so I gave them it



Edit: Wait, it was you that asked. Why are you insulting me for substantiating your query?